George Mitchell's return to duty as Barack Obama's special envoy to the Middle East, said Jackson Diehl in The Washington Post, "is a reminder that much of what the new administration is facing in the region isn't new—and neither is the initial strategy that Obama has adopted."
Obama learned one thing from the Clinton and Bush administrations' failed "final-year" peace pushes, said USA Today in an editorial. Every modern president gets embroiled in the conflict between Israel and Palestine eventually, so it's best to plunge in at the outset. And Mitchell is an "honest broker" with experience, so picking him is a good start.
In many ways the situation is more difficult than it was in 2001, said The New York Times in an editorial, when former senator Mitchell produced a report on a failed Israeli-Palestinian cease-fire for then-president Bill Clinton. Hamas, now in control of Gaza, "shows no interest in making peace with Israel." So Mitchell faces an "unenviable" job, but it's an essential one.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- The U.S. is about to sell weapons to Vietnam. That's bad news for China.
- Why is the Pentagon stuffing caves in Norway full of tanks?
- What the Middle Ages can tell us about the GOP's big charity myth
- An open letter to #brands about Gamergate
- Did the media get Ferguson wrong?
- The most sensible GOP alternative to ObamaCare comes from a Senate candidate who is almost sure to lose
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- 'Having it all' has officially jumped the shark
- Did Republicans overshoot on the Ebola panic?
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
Subscribe to the Week