“In another sign that literary criticism is losing its profile in newspapers,” said Motoko Rich in The New York Times, The Washington Post announced that after Feb. 15, the paper will “shutter the print version of 'Book World,'” the stand-alone book reviews section—one of the last and largest in the country—that appears in its Sunday edition.
“My heart goes out to my friends in the publishing world, said Bruce Reed in Slate, “and I'll miss ‘Book World’ as much as the next guy.” But for the book world in general, “like the auto industry and the newspaper business, the sharp economic downturn is accelerating painful changes that were already under way and were bound to hit in the next decade, anyway.”
The thing is, said Rachel Hartigan Shea in The Washington Post, “we are not going away.” In fact, “if you read ‘Book World’ online, you may not notice any change in our coverage at all and might even see some improvements.” In print, the usual contents of ‘Book World’ will just be dispersed into other sections of the paper. We still believe that “books are vital to understanding our world,” so we’ll keep covering them.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why ABC threw its Bachelor under the bus
- Why are so many elderly Asians killing themselves?
- Why Ted Cruz is the real-life Frank Underwood
- Why I'm sick and tired of seeing naked women on HBO
- Here's how Iran is covering Russia's invasion of Crimea
- Here's proof that Justin Bieber is just as spoiled as you always thought
- 22 TV shows to watch in 2014
- What the collapse of the Ming Dynasty can tell us about American decline
- Watch Zach Galifianakis get annoyed at President Obama on Between Two Ferns
- Bill O'Reilly: Obama's comedy is unpresidential, because Abe Lincoln
Subscribe to the Week