he votes are still being counted in Iraq, said National Review Online in an editorial, but it's not too early to call the provincial elections a success. Sunni and Shiite secular parties fared better than their religious counterparts, and the balloting took place in "an environment of calm that would have been unimaginable two years ago," before the surge.
That's one way to look at it, said Leila Fadel in the Kansas City Star, but turnout was the lowest in the new Iraq's short history, despite the calm. Many Iraqis chalked up voter apathy to "disenchantment with a democracy that, so far, has brought them very little."
Yes, the turnout of 51 percent was considerably lower than anticipated, said Britain's The Independent in an editorial. "Yet it would be wrong to dismiss the importance of this moment," which showed that the Iraqi security forces, in their first such test, were able to keep the election peaceful.
Things are going "perplexingly well" in Iraq, said Bret Stephens in The Wall Street Journal. So much so that—with next-door Iran ever closer to its nuclear bomb, and nearby Pakistan and Afghanistan getting worse—Iraq could turn out to be the pillar of the Obama administration's strategy for the region.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How my boyfriend and I learned to live on one income
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- Why Texas Republicans may want to cool the anti-Obama land-grab talk
- Why the poor's investment of choice is so alarming
- Why China's Communist Party is headed for collapse
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Why atheism doesn't have the upper hand over religion
- Why conservatives see rural America as the 'real' America
- How to make perfect fried rice in 6 easy steps
- Affirmative action is doomed. Here's what progressives should do about it.
Subscribe to the Week