wo hundred years have passed since Charles Darwin’s birth, said Verlyn Klinkenborg in The New York Times. But the famed naturalist's central idea—“evolution by means of natural selection”—has aged well. “It is absorbed, with adaptations, into the foundation of the biological sciences. In a very real sense, it is the cornerstone of what we know about life on earth.”
Is it? asked Jonathan Wells in The Washington Times. Darwin’s theory wasn’t just evolution, or change over time, which “no sane person denies.” His point in “On the Origin of Species” was that “all living things are descendants of a common ancestor.” That remains an unproven assumption, yet "militant atheists" will tolerate no disagreement from those who see God's hand in these matters.
Actually, Darwin didn’t “pick fights over what he did not know,” said Rick Weiss in The Washington Post. His “keen observation” caused him to abandon the belief that God created the world exactly as it is. Still, he didn’t claim to unlock “the all-important question of creation” itself—if only the “soldiers in today's culture wars, whether in black collars or white lab coats,” had the same humility.
- How the vitamin industrial complex swindled America
- Robots are the not-too-distant future of war
- This may be why youngest children are so bratty
- Fox News has already lost its War on Christmas
- 4 tech tools that are disrupting the doctor's office
- Why conservatives just don't get Pope Francis' anti-poverty crusade
- The perfect-goatee maker
- Based on a true story? Fact-checking 6 Oscar contenders
- How to make people like you: 6 science-based conversation hacks
- How to give birth (100 years ago)
Subscribe to the Week