President Obama on Friday said the U.S. had begun the work of ending the Iraq war. “Let me say this as plainly as I can," Obama said to Marines at Camp Lejeune, N.C. "By Aug. 31, 2010, our combat mission in Iraq will end." (The New York Times)
What the commentators said
Obama can follow this timetable without "plunging Iraq back into chaos," said Tim Cocks in Reuters, but his plan has risks. Iraqi forces are ready to start taking on greater responsibilities, and long-term stability will depend on them. But the Obama administration will have to "use adroit diplomacy" to make sure rival Iraqi groups don't backslide into fresh conflict.
It's a measure of how much conditions have changed, said Demetri Sevastopulo and Andrew Ward in the Financial Times, that Obama's plan won the approval of Sen. John McCain, his Republican rival in the presidential campaign. Before the election, McCain said Obama would "cut and run," but McCain is now one of the most important "cheerleaders" for Obama's withdrawal plan.
It's ironic, said John Barry in Newsweek. "Obama campaigned on the notion that Iraq was the bad war, and Afghanistan the good war." But now "the Iraq occupation, however bungled, gives promise of success." And that will allow Obama to fulfill a promise by bringing the troops home in time for the mid-term elections—giving him both military and "political triumph."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why Pakistan won't hunt down the terrorists within its borders
- Sorry, GOP, tax cuts don't pay for themselves
- How academia's liberal bias is killing social science
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- Pope Francis' American problem
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Are there dogs in heaven? Let's hope not.
- Hey, bosses: Stop giving bonuses to your employees
- This week I learned your coin toss odds are better than you think, and more
Subscribe to the Week