President Obama on Friday said the U.S. had begun the work of ending the Iraq war. “Let me say this as plainly as I can," Obama said to Marines at Camp Lejeune, N.C. "By Aug. 31, 2010, our combat mission in Iraq will end." (The New York Times)
What the commentators said
Obama can follow this timetable without "plunging Iraq back into chaos," said Tim Cocks in Reuters, but his plan has risks. Iraqi forces are ready to start taking on greater responsibilities, and long-term stability will depend on them. But the Obama administration will have to "use adroit diplomacy" to make sure rival Iraqi groups don't backslide into fresh conflict.
It's a measure of how much conditions have changed, said Demetri Sevastopulo and Andrew Ward in the Financial Times, that Obama's plan won the approval of Sen. John McCain, his Republican rival in the presidential campaign. Before the election, McCain said Obama would "cut and run," but McCain is now one of the most important "cheerleaders" for Obama's withdrawal plan.
It's ironic, said John Barry in Newsweek. "Obama campaigned on the notion that Iraq was the bad war, and Afghanistan the good war." But now "the Iraq occupation, however bungled, gives promise of success." And that will allow Obama to fulfill a promise by bringing the troops home in time for the mid-term elections—giving him both military and "political triumph."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Why is it so expensive to build a bridge in America?
- What the collapse of the Ming Dynasty can tell us about American decline
- Here's proof that Justin Bieber is just as spoiled as you always thought
- 22 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Why is American internet so slow?
- What would a U.S.-China war look like?
- 7 ways to be the most interesting person in any room
- The GOP must try to win over African-Americans
Subscribe to the Week