President Obama on Friday said the U.S. had begun the work of ending the Iraq war. “Let me say this as plainly as I can," Obama said to Marines at Camp Lejeune, N.C. "By Aug. 31, 2010, our combat mission in Iraq will end." (The New York Times)
What the commentators said
Obama can follow this timetable without "plunging Iraq back into chaos," said Tim Cocks in Reuters, but his plan has risks. Iraqi forces are ready to start taking on greater responsibilities, and long-term stability will depend on them. But the Obama administration will have to "use adroit diplomacy" to make sure rival Iraqi groups don't backslide into fresh conflict.
It's a measure of how much conditions have changed, said Demetri Sevastopulo and Andrew Ward in the Financial Times, that Obama's plan won the approval of Sen. John McCain, his Republican rival in the presidential campaign. Before the election, McCain said Obama would "cut and run," but McCain is now one of the most important "cheerleaders" for Obama's withdrawal plan.
It's ironic, said John Barry in Newsweek. "Obama campaigned on the notion that Iraq was the bad war, and Afghanistan the good war." But now "the Iraq occupation, however bungled, gives promise of success." And that will allow Obama to fulfill a promise by bringing the troops home in time for the mid-term elections—giving him both military and "political triumph."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- The U.S. is about to sell weapons to Vietnam. That's bad news for China.
- What the Middle Ages can tell us about the GOP's big charity myth
- Why is the Pentagon stuffing caves in Norway full of tanks?
- An open letter to #brands about Gamergate
- Did the media get Ferguson wrong?
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- 'Having it all' has officially jumped the shark
- Gamergate has backfired spectacularly on its nincompoop perpetrators
- Did Republicans overshoot on the Ebola panic?
Subscribe to the Week