After years of brutal rape, murder, and torture in Darfur, Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir "has finally earned his day of infamy,” said Michael Kevane and Beth Van Schaack in the San Francisco Chronicle. The International Criminal Court indicted him for war crimes and crimes against humanity, in its first case against a sitting head of state. Whether or not he’s arrested—and we think his underlings will “throw him to the ICC”—this is “a moral victory.”
“It is easy to feel some moral satisfaction” in the arrest warrant, said The Washington Post in an editorial, but even proponents of the indictment acknowledge that it might make things worse in Sudan. Bashir has already taken action against foreign aid groups. And what comes next? China will block “any forceful action” by the U.N. and Western forces are “stretched thin” elsewhere.
First, aid workers have to be allowed back in, said Nicholas Kristof in The New York Times. If Bashir refuses, we should destroy his Chinese-trained air force, one plane at a time, until he relents. Bashir is not a “sadistic monster,” but a “calculating pragmatist”—the ICC warrant, if we back it up, is a first step toward showing him and his fellow despots that “systematic brutality” carries a high cost.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- After Ferguson: Stop deferring to the cops
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- 7 grammar rules you really should pay attention to
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- Ferguson riots were terrible — but this racist reaction was worse
- The hilarious hypocrisy of Republicans complaining about the imperial presidency
- Is it now OK to have sex with animals?
- How to survive a spaceship disaster
- In Ferguson, Michael Brown lost his life — and America's police lost the benefit of the doubt
- Don't argue about politics this Thanksgiving. Just don't.
Subscribe to the Week