President Obama has his priorities reversed on the dangerous Afghanistan-Pakistan border, said Graham Allison and John Deutch in The Wall Street Journal. Obama improved on the Bush administration's Afghanistan policy by acknowledging that it's an “Af-Pak” issue, but Obama still acts like stabilizing Afghanistan is priority No. 1. But the al Qaida terrorists who planned 9/11 aren’t in Afghanistan anymore—“the heart of the problem” is now across the border in Pakistan.
It‘s not that simple, said USA Today in an editorial. “Preventing al Qaida from regaining a foothold in Afghanistan is crucial to U.S. security.” But we do need to win in Pakistan, too. And—with Pakistan’s lawless tribal regions, highly placed al Qaida sympathizers, and nuclear weapons—the “Pak part” of the Af-Pak issue “might well prove to be the most difficult and decisive.”
“The problem along the Afghan border is not mass support for Islamist extremism,” said Douglas J. Feith and Justin Polin in The New York Times. “It is widespread acquiescence” to extremists who have crushed Pakistan’s moderate Sufi tradition and claimed “the exclusive right to fly the banner of Islam.” Maybe what we need is a Cold War–style strategic communications counterattack—call it Radio Free Swat Valley.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- The U.S. is about to sell weapons to Vietnam. That's bad news for China.
- What the Middle Ages can tell us about the GOP's big charity myth
- Why is the Pentagon stuffing caves in Norway full of tanks?
- An open letter to #brands about Gamergate
- The most sensible GOP alternative to ObamaCare comes from a Senate candidate who is almost sure to lose
- When Khomeini said no to Iranian nukes
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- Did the media get Ferguson wrong?
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- 10 things you need to know today: October 23, 2014
Subscribe to the Week