resident Obama has his priorities reversed on the dangerous Afghanistan-Pakistan border, said Graham Allison and John Deutch in The Wall Street Journal. Obama improved on the Bush administration's Afghanistan policy by acknowledging that it's an “Af-Pak” issue, but Obama still acts like stabilizing Afghanistan is priority No. 1. But the al Qaida terrorists who planned 9/11 aren’t in Afghanistan anymore—“the heart of the problem” is now across the border in Pakistan.
It‘s not that simple, said USA Today in an editorial. “Preventing al Qaida from regaining a foothold in Afghanistan is crucial to U.S. security.” But we do need to win in Pakistan, too. And—with Pakistan’s lawless tribal regions, highly placed al Qaida sympathizers, and nuclear weapons—the “Pak part” of the Af-Pak issue “might well prove to be the most difficult and decisive.”
“The problem along the Afghan border is not mass support for Islamist extremism,” said Douglas J. Feith and Justin Polin in The New York Times. “It is widespread acquiescence” to extremists who have crushed Pakistan’s moderate Sufi tradition and claimed “the exclusive right to fly the banner of Islam.” Maybe what we need is a Cold War–style strategic communications counterattack—call it Radio Free Swat Valley.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Who are the real gay marriage bigots?
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Why is American internet so slow?
- What the collapse of the Ming Dynasty can tell us about American decline
- Don't worry: World War III will almost certainly never happen
- Religious liberty should be a liberal value, too
- The new bride who had a horrifying allergic reaction to her husband's sperm
- Watch The Daily Show mock Fox News' confused man-crush on Vladimir Putin
- How to take the perfect profile picture for online dating, according to science
- 22 TV shows to watch in 2014
Subscribe to the Week