"The cheesy 3-D gimmick of old Hollywood has become solid gold today," said the AP's David Germain via Google. The DreamWorks Animation comedy Monsters vs. Aliens (read a review of the reviews or watch the trailer) made more than half of its industry-leading $59.3 million opening weekend haul from 3-D screens—even though only 2,080 of the 7,300 screens showing the film were equipped for 3-D. It looks like the studios are right: 3-D is the future.
Monsters vs. Aliens proved that a big-budget 3-D film can be commercially viable, said Alex Dobuzinskis in Reuters, but the technology still faces obstacles. "Analysts say Monsters vs. Aliens could have done better at the box office had the credit crunch not hampered the rollout of expensive digital equipment needed to screen 3-D movies."
"Recession-addled filmgoers" are clearly willing to shell out $3 extra to watch a film in 3-D, said Lane Brown in New York magazine, but they'll come to regret falling for this "silly gimmick." Hollywood will soon stop giving us the option of paying a mere $12 to watch a film "in two measly dimensions." When that day comes, nobody who paid as much as $18.50 for a ticket to Monsters vs. Aliens gets to complain.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Obama just kneecapped Jeb Bush and Chris Christie's 2016 prospects
- 10 classic Sesame Street moments we wouldn't show today's kids
- 6 tiny scientific mistakes that created huge disasters
- It's official: The religious right is calling it quits
- 10 things you need to know today: November 21, 2014
- The Hunger Games: Mockingjay — Part 1: 10 major differences between the book and the movie
- The dangerously childish morality of liberal ObamaCare supporters
- What could happen if the Supreme Court rules against ObamaCare
- The slippery slope of Twitter's attempts to stop harassment against women
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
Subscribe to the Week