"The cheesy 3-D gimmick of old Hollywood has become solid gold today," said the AP's David Germain via Google. The DreamWorks Animation comedy Monsters vs. Aliens (read a review of the reviews or watch the trailer) made more than half of its industry-leading $59.3 million opening weekend haul from 3-D screens—even though only 2,080 of the 7,300 screens showing the film were equipped for 3-D. It looks like the studios are right: 3-D is the future.
Monsters vs. Aliens proved that a big-budget 3-D film can be commercially viable, said Alex Dobuzinskis in Reuters, but the technology still faces obstacles. "Analysts say Monsters vs. Aliens could have done better at the box office had the credit crunch not hampered the rollout of expensive digital equipment needed to screen 3-D movies."
"Recession-addled filmgoers" are clearly willing to shell out $3 extra to watch a film in 3-D, said Lane Brown in New York magazine, but they'll come to regret falling for this "silly gimmick." Hollywood will soon stop giving us the option of paying a mere $12 to watch a film "in two measly dimensions." When that day comes, nobody who paid as much as $18.50 for a ticket to Monsters vs. Aliens gets to complain.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why would a young person today be religious?
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Why we can't stop procrastinating, according to science
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- Israel and Russia are getting along. Have the neocons noticed?
- The world's dumbest idea: Taxing solar energy
- The 6-year-old who woke up from a coma with a different personality
- Why Holy Thursday is so important to Christians
- Why I'm a pro-life liberal
- How Community's Dean Pelton broke new ground for sexual politics on television
Subscribe to the Week