"The cheesy 3-D gimmick of old Hollywood has become solid gold today," said the AP's David Germain via Google. The DreamWorks Animation comedy Monsters vs. Aliens (read a review of the reviews or watch the trailer) made more than half of its industry-leading $59.3 million opening weekend haul from 3-D screens—even though only 2,080 of the 7,300 screens showing the film were equipped for 3-D. It looks like the studios are right: 3-D is the future.
Monsters vs. Aliens proved that a big-budget 3-D film can be commercially viable, said Alex Dobuzinskis in Reuters, but the technology still faces obstacles. "Analysts say Monsters vs. Aliens could have done better at the box office had the credit crunch not hampered the rollout of expensive digital equipment needed to screen 3-D movies."
"Recession-addled filmgoers" are clearly willing to shell out $3 extra to watch a film in 3-D, said Lane Brown in New York magazine, but they'll come to regret falling for this "silly gimmick." Hollywood will soon stop giving us the option of paying a mere $12 to watch a film "in two measly dimensions." When that day comes, nobody who paid as much as $18.50 for a ticket to Monsters vs. Aliens gets to complain.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why you shouldn't eat dog. Not even once.
- Why Israel can no longer let the Palestinian Authority be responsible for security in the West Bank
- How U.S. special forces are preparing for the worst-case scenario in North Korea
- Why you should really take a nap this afternoon, according to science
- Here's the schedule very successful people follow every day
- Why charity can't solve society's deepest problems
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- How social conservatives became a minority in need of protection
- I hate Ayn Rand — but here's why my fellow conservatives love her
- Grammar quiz: Do you know the passive voice?
Subscribe to the Week