Defense Secretary Robert Gates’ attempt to “gut the military” with his new budget should not go unchallenged, said Thomas Donnelly and Gary Schmitt in The Wall Street Journal. Gates’ proposal to cut the F-22 jet, the Future Combat Systems ground vehicle, and the Airborne Laser anti-missile program would help enable President Obama’s domestic spending binge, but the price would be “a future U.S. military that is smaller and packs less wallop.”
Gutting the military? Hardly, said The New York Times in an editorial. Gates wants to raise basic Pentagon spending by $20 billion. If anything, his budget doesn’t “go far enough” toward a much-needed restructuring of our defense spending. For example, Gates actually wants to buy four more F-22s—a plane designed to fight the USSR, and one we’ve never used in a real war.
The budget won’t thrill either liberals or conservatives, said the Los Angeles Times in an editorial, but as a “balancing act between defense and other priorities, it’s just about right.” It’s a useless piece of paper, though, unless Obama’s team can push it past “congressional hawks”—who are typically more worried about defense contracting jobs in their districts than national security concerns.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How our botched understanding of 'science' ruins everything
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- Mike Huckabee's head-scratching advice to Christian voters
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How Scotland's independence movement lost the vote and still won everything
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- The science of sex: 4 harsh truths about dating and mating
- Why so many Christians won't back down on gay marriage
- Adrian Peterson and our misguided debate about spanking
- The Tea Party has its own immigration problem: Cuba
Subscribe to the Week