resident Obama made some “long overdue” changes to U.S. policy toward Cuba, said Nicholas Kristof in The New York Times, allowing Cuban-Americans to freely visit and send money to relatives on the Communist island. But he “should go much further” and invade Cuba—with U.S. tourists. “Hordes of Americans complaining bitterly about the lack of Wi-Fi” would do more to foster change than our failed trade embargo.
Two million tourists already visit Cuba each year, and that hasn't exactly brought democracy, said Maria Werlau in The Wall Street Journal. So both engagement and the “ethically justified” U.S. embargo have failed. What we need is “conditional engagement,” with the U.S. and the international community wielding carrots and sticks together.
The ball is now in the Castro brothers’ court, said The Miami Herald in an editorial. Obama’s “commendable” and popular first step needs to be met by some “reciprocal gestures.” If Cuba responds by freeing political prisoners and opening the Internet to more Cuban, maybe we can take another step forward.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- How my boyfriend and I learned to live on one income
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Why the poor's investment of choice is so alarming
- Affirmative action is doomed. Here's what progressives should do about it.
- Why China's Communist Party is headed for collapse
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Obama's next steps on immigration
- How to make perfect fried rice in 6 easy steps
- Why Texas Republicans may want to cool the anti-Obama land-grab talk
Subscribe to the Week