If President Obama's goal is to get more cozy with the region's "dictators and left-wing populists" than George W. Bush was, said Mary Anastasia O'Grady in The Wall Street Journal, then Obama can "chalk up a win" after the weekend's Summit of the Americas. But if Obama "sought to advance American ideals, things didn't go well," because he let the freest country in the region take a beating from Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, Bolivia's Evo Morales, and Nicaragua's Daniel Ortega.
"Obama did right to listen to all the complaints," said La Opinion in an editorial, and to remind everybody that "it is inaccurate to blame the United States for all the region's problems." Obama showed that the U.S. can change by promising to be an effective partner—"a 180-degree turnaround" from George W. Bush's message. The uncooperative response from Chavez & Co. showed that they're the ones not ready for change.
Obama's handshake with the "leftist" Chavez, said USA Today in an editorial, and his attempt to reach out to Cuba were striking examples of his "campaign to remake America's relationship" with the rest of the world. "It remains to be seen what tangible results can be achieved with this softer sell. But Latin America could be the perfect place to try it out."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- How our botched understanding of 'science' ruins everything
- How Scotland's independence movement lost the vote and still won everything
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Mike Huckabee's head-scratching advice to Christian voters
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- The American middle class is no longer safe from poverty — and that might be a good thing
- Adrian Peterson and our misguided debate about spanking
- The Tea Party has its own immigration problem: Cuba
- 10 things you need to know today: September 19, 2014
Subscribe to the Week