“What the hell is going on with Jackie Chan?” said Mack Rawden in Cinema Blend. “Idiotically bloviating” at the Boao Forum in China recently, the action star said he wasn’t sure if freedom was best for the Chinese people. Nice, Jackie. As China stomps on journalists and "enemies of the state," feel free to "turn the other way."
“Chan is just saying what a lot of other rich Chinese feel,” said John Pomfret in The Washington Post. The elite are "increasingly free” in China, but they “rely on the instruments of state" to protect their advantages over the masses. Chan is probably glad “that Communism is dead, but he likes the fact that the Communist Party is safeguarding the interests of the well-heeled.”
Jackie Chan was just trying to “to curry favor with the Chinese government,” said Kate Ray in Shanghaiist. His recent movie Shinjuku Incident was “banned in China for being too violent,” so he was cut off from a huge market. But Chan’s tactic could backfire: “It’s the Chinese people” who watch his movies, and his “political misstatements” probably didn’t sit well with them.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- China's leader is telling the People's Liberation Army to prepare for war
- How I lost all my money
- Why Pakistan won't hunt down the terrorists within its borders
- How to save money: 12 great personal finance tips
- The best books we read in 2014
- The religious right isn't retreating — it's reforming
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- How academia's liberal bias is killing social science
- Diagnosing the Home Alone burglars' injuries: A professional weighs in
- How to wrap a present with mathematical precision (and waste less paper)
Subscribe to the Week