Under pending deals to stave off bankruptcy at Chrysler and General Motors, the United Auto Workers union would take 55 percent ownership of Chrysler and a 39 percent stake in GM. In return, the automakers would slash contributions to their UAW health-care pension funds. The U.S. government would hold 50 percent of GM’s stock. (The Globe and Mail)
What the commentators said
UAW workers now get to show if they can run GM and Chrysler better than their bosses, said Dean Foust in BusinessWeek. And if a similar experiment at United Airlines is any guide, their success hinges largely on whether they “act as owners,” including accepting the “trade-offs and sacrifices that owners sometimes have to make.”
Fat chance, said Holman Jenkins in The Wall Street Journal. Now on both sides of the labor contract bargaining table, the UAW will continue to “extract uncompetitive pay and benefits,” with support—and directives on making unmarketable “green” cars—from Washington. Bankruptcy would be preferable, as it would be for the benefit of the automakers’ “shafted” creditors, not its workers.
Some “conservative ideologues” may see this as an attack on “free market principles,” said the Detroit Free Press in an editorial. But the “more adventuresome” among us might look at it as a challenge: Can Uncle Sam and the UAW really “save auto jobs, reduce climate-warming pollutants, diminish dependence on foreign oil, and turn a profit, all at the same time”?
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How the South's ugly racial history is haunting ObamaCare
- The real story behind Deliver Us From Evil
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Feast your eyes on this beautiful linguistic family tree
- If Democrats abandon immigration reform after Tuesday's likely loss, they will turn 2016 into a debacle
- What if Leo Strauss was right?
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- The culture war finally comes to the Catholic Church
- Stop making fun of philosophy and read some philosophy
- Beware of Splenda: The backlash against artificial sugars
Subscribe to the Week