President Asif Ali Zardari has finally “struck back” at the “growing Taliban insurgency” threatening Pakistan, said the Toronto Star in an editorial. The Taliban took advantage of Zardari’s “ill-conceived” surrender of the Swat Valley to seize areas close to the capital. With the Taliban too close for comfort, Zardari has belatedly sent in commandos and military aircraft to retake the seized Buner area.
Unfortunately, there’s “profound doubt” about the Pakistani military’s loyalties, said Greg Sheridan in The Australian. Many troops sympathize with the Taliban, and the military doesn’t want to risk its popularity by killing fellow Pakistanis. Add in Zardari’s “pathetically weak” government, and nuclear-armed Pakistan is the “worst and most dangerous security situation in the world.”
Ten thousand "ragtag" Taliban fighters can't defeat Pakistan's "well-equipped, very professional 550,000-strong" army, said Pepe Escobar in Asia Times. Besides, “semi-literate” insurgents could never crack Pakistan’s nuclear codes. So why the “hysteria”? The U.S. gets a new “ûber-bogeyman,” Pakistan gets more military aid—and impoverished Pakistanis get nothing but violence.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- 13 Urban Outfitters controversies
- This is how the U.S. thinks China could invade Taiwan
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- The science of sex: 4 harsh truths about dating and mating
- Obama knows he can't really 'defeat' ISIS. Americans need to wake up to that reality, too.
- Why you should stop believing in evolution
- Can we lead spiritually fulfilling lives without religion?
- Surviving a plane crash
- The demagoguery of Ted Cruz and his cheerleaders in the conservative media
Subscribe to the Week