President Asif Ali Zardari has finally “struck back” at the “growing Taliban insurgency” threatening Pakistan, said the Toronto Star in an editorial. The Taliban took advantage of Zardari’s “ill-conceived” surrender of the Swat Valley to seize areas close to the capital. With the Taliban too close for comfort, Zardari has belatedly sent in commandos and military aircraft to retake the seized Buner area.
Unfortunately, there’s “profound doubt” about the Pakistani military’s loyalties, said Greg Sheridan in The Australian. Many troops sympathize with the Taliban, and the military doesn’t want to risk its popularity by killing fellow Pakistanis. Add in Zardari’s “pathetically weak” government, and nuclear-armed Pakistan is the “worst and most dangerous security situation in the world.”
Ten thousand "ragtag" Taliban fighters can't defeat Pakistan's "well-equipped, very professional 550,000-strong" army, said Pepe Escobar in Asia Times. Besides, “semi-literate” insurgents could never crack Pakistan’s nuclear codes. So why the “hysteria”? The U.S. gets a new “ûber-bogeyman,” Pakistan gets more military aid—and impoverished Pakistanis get nothing but violence.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why all drugs should be legal. (Yes, even heroin.)
- 7 ideas from ancient thinkers that will improve your modern life
- Why you should really take a nap this afternoon, according to science
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Here's the schedule very successful people follow every day
- The forgotten victims of the war in Ukraine
- Comic-Con 2014: Everything we learned about Avengers 2, Batman v. Superman, and more
- How to trim $500 from your monthly spending
- The big, gaping hole in the liberal policy arsenal
Subscribe to the Week