on Howard does a “fantastic” job of adapting Dan Brown’s novel Angels & Demons for the big screen, said Edward Douglas in Comingsoon.net. This “faith vs. science” conspiracy thriller, a follow-up to The Da Vinci Code, “moves at a brisk pace without cutting corners from the novel,” and falls “somewhere between the Hannibal Lecter and the Bourne films” in terms of staging action “amidst an impressive setting full of historical culture.” (watch the trailer for Angels & Demons)
“Relative to its predecessor's laughably goofy conspiracy theory plot,” said Nick Schager in Slant Magazine, Angels & Demons is “slightly less absurd.” And even if “the story isn't nearly as ridiculous” as that of The Da Vinci Code, “Ron Howard still impeccably maintains the series' turgid mediocrity.”
Angels & Demons is actually “Ron Howard’s funniest film since Splash!” said Sean Burns in Philadelphia Weekly. “But not on purpose.” I’ve never read any of Dan Brown’s novels, so I have to ask: Are they as “stupid as the films they’ve inspired?” This latest “boondoggle” is completely “preposterous.”
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why is American internet so slow?
- Colorado’s new ‘drive high, get a DUI’ commercials are actually pretty clever
- 7 ways to be the most interesting person in any room
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- What the collapse of the Ming Dynasty can tell us about American decline
- Who are the real gay marriage bigots?
- 22 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Ukraine's fraught relationship with Russia: A brief history
- Sorry Belle Knox, porn still oppresses women
- 10 things you need to know today: March 9, 2014
Subscribe to the Week