on Howard does a “fantastic” job of adapting Dan Brown’s novel Angels & Demons for the big screen, said Edward Douglas in Comingsoon.net. This “faith vs. science” conspiracy thriller, a follow-up to The Da Vinci Code, “moves at a brisk pace without cutting corners from the novel,” and falls “somewhere between the Hannibal Lecter and the Bourne films” in terms of staging action “amidst an impressive setting full of historical culture.” (watch the trailer for Angels & Demons)
“Relative to its predecessor's laughably goofy conspiracy theory plot,” said Nick Schager in Slant Magazine, Angels & Demons is “slightly less absurd.” And even if “the story isn't nearly as ridiculous” as that of The Da Vinci Code, “Ron Howard still impeccably maintains the series' turgid mediocrity.”
Angels & Demons is actually “Ron Howard’s funniest film since Splash!” said Sean Burns in Philadelphia Weekly. “But not on purpose.” I’ve never read any of Dan Brown’s novels, so I have to ask: Are they as “stupid as the films they’ve inspired?” This latest “boondoggle” is completely “preposterous.”
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- How my boyfriend and I learned to live on one income
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Why the poor's investment of choice is so alarming
- Affirmative action is doomed. Here's what progressives should do about it.
- Why China's Communist Party is headed for collapse
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- How to make perfect fried rice in 6 easy steps
- Why Texas Republicans may want to cool the anti-Obama land-grab talk
- Why conservatives see rural America as the 'real' America
Subscribe to the Week