in is in, said the Tax Foundation’s Patrick Fleenor in The Christian Science Monitor, or at least sin taxes are. Money-hungry “nanny-staters” in Congress are considering a proposal to add a tax to soft-drink sales, as a way to pay for health-care reform. That’s what these “busybodies” always do: sell their ruler-on-knuckle taxes as a way for a minority of sinners to compensate society for the cost of their sins. Instead, it’s an affront to freedom of choice.
The “sin tax” on health-damaging sugary drinks will probably die in Congress, said Dan Mitchell in Slate’s The Big Money, killing some $24 billion in revenue over four years, at 3 cents a pop. But when the beverage industry says the “food police” want to tell you what to eat and drink, remember, this group makes a fortune persuading “Americans to consume a lot of crap.”
That $24 billion is chump change, said Nick Gillespie in The New York Times. Why not tax all vices, including all gambling and drugs, and prostitution? If we legalize, and tax, these activities, we can go a long way toward paying for health care and green energy. “There’s a lot to be said for treating consenting adults like, well, adults”—and a lot to gain, too.
- Why conservatives just don't get Pope Francis' anti-poverty crusade
- 4 tech tools that are disrupting the doctor's office
- Eli Manning is the worst quarterback since Mark Sanchez
- How to make people like you: 6 science-based conversation hacks
- Why does China's Moon Rover exhibit show a nuclear mushroom cloud over Europe?
- Diagnosing the Home Alone burglars' injuries: A professional weighs in
- I make a six-figure salary — but I'm in financial trouble
- Watch The Daily Show belittle China's moon landing
- Get ready for a massive renewable energy boom
- Is Obama really doing worse than Bush and Nixon?
Subscribe to the Week