The public words Monday between President Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu were “warm and friendly,” said the New York Post in an editorial, but there were clear signs of “fundamental disagreement” underneath. Netanyahu refused to endorse Obama’s top priority—establishing a separate Palestinian state—and Obama blithely downplayed the threat of Iranian nukes, Netanyau’s main concern. The historically tightknit U.S.-Israeli relationship is “entering unchartered waters.”
Obama’s “tough love” approach to Israel might start a “new chapter” in the 60-year-old friendship, said Elise Labott in CNN, but “no one expects a drastic change.” And while some Israelis worry that the Obama team’s tougher stance jeopardizes the “special strategic relationship” between the two nations, this new “evenhandedness” could help win over Arab nations to Obama’s approach to Mideast peace.
Netanyahu has some cards to play, too, said Bret Stephens in The Wall Street Journal, and he might want to remind Obama of that. He is willing to bomb Iran, which would “mean big trouble for U.S. interests” in Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East. Just as being thought of as "a little bit crazy" helped Richard Nixon, it might help Netanyahu get Obama to rethink his priorities.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- The U.S. is about to sell weapons to Vietnam. That's bad news for China.
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Why is the Pentagon stuffing caves in Norway full of tanks?
- What the Middle Ages can tell us about the GOP's big charity myth
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- 3 horrific inaccuracies in Homeland's depiction of Islamabad
- Gamergate has backfired spectacularly on its nincompoop perpetrators
- The simple trick to making better decisions in every aspect of life
- An open letter to #brands about Gamergate
- Why the Chinese military is only a paper dragon
Subscribe to the Week