he public words Monday between President Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu were “warm and friendly,” said the New York Post in an editorial, but there were clear signs of “fundamental disagreement” underneath. Netanyahu refused to endorse Obama’s top priority—establishing a separate Palestinian state—and Obama blithely downplayed the threat of Iranian nukes, Netanyau’s main concern. The historically tightknit U.S.-Israeli relationship is “entering unchartered waters.”
Obama’s “tough love” approach to Israel might start a “new chapter” in the 60-year-old friendship, said Elise Labott in CNN, but “no one expects a drastic change.” And while some Israelis worry that the Obama team’s tougher stance jeopardizes the “special strategic relationship” between the two nations, this new “evenhandedness” could help win over Arab nations to Obama’s approach to Mideast peace.
Netanyahu has some cards to play, too, said Bret Stephens in The Wall Street Journal, and he might want to remind Obama of that. He is willing to bomb Iran, which would “mean big trouble for U.S. interests” in Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East. Just as being thought of as "a little bit crazy" helped Richard Nixon, it might help Netanyahu get Obama to rethink his priorities.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Who are the real gay marriage bigots?
- Sorry Belle Knox, porn still oppresses women
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- What the collapse of the Ming Dynasty can tell us about American decline
- Religious liberty should be a liberal value, too
- Watch The Daily Show mock Fox News' confused man-crush on Vladimir Putin
- Why is American internet so slow?
- Is the Republican Party in danger of dying out?
- Don't worry: World War III will almost certainly never happen
- The best movies to watch in theaters this month
Subscribe to the Week