President Obama and Dick Cheney have delivered their dueling national security speeches, said Chris Cillizza in The Washington Post. “Let the analysis begin!” Obama argued that keeping America safe is his main priority, but that Guantánamo Bay and waterboarding are part of the problem, not the solution. In the Cheney speech, the former vice president argued that Obama “is too worried about political correctness to recognize that the policies of the last president have worked in keeping the country safe.”
The Cheney speech was built on a faulty premise, said Jack Goldsmith in The New Republic. Obama hasn’t reversed Bush-era counterterrorism policies—he's really just pushing similar policies with better the packaging. The adjustments he has made, including moving to close Guantánamo and ban torture, “are designed to fortify the bulk of the Bush program for the long run” by shoring up global support for our cause.
The idea in Obama's “platitudinous and preachy” speech that making anti-terror policy more palatable will make it more effective is what you'd expect from a young senator and law professor, said William Kristol in The Weekly Standard. Cheney’s defense of the Bush administration's national security record was the speech you’d expect from a “grown-up,” a “chief executive,” a “statesman.” Obama has “pseudo-thoughtful ideas” about how to keep America safe—Cheney knows how to do it from experience.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why the West should let Russia have eastern Ukraine
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- 9 Harvard dropouts who became fabulously successful
- 7 grammar rules you really should pay attention to
- Why you should stop believing in evolution
- The dangers of our passionless American life
- What is Molly? Everything you need to know about the party drug
- Your literary playlist: A guide to the music of Haruki Murakami
- What would a U.S.-China war look like?
- How China sparked an Asian frenzy for killer submarines
Subscribe to the Week