“Don’t piss off J.D. Salinger,” said Steven W. Beattle in Quill & Quire. The “famously reclusive author” of the “iconic” 1951 novel The Catcher in the Rye filed a lawsuit Monday against the “improbably named” writer John David California for his book 60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye, a supposed sequel to Salinger’s original. J.D. California had better watch out: Salinger is “famously litigious,” and it’s unlikely that he’ll back down in his attempt to stop the book from being published.
And he shouldn’t, said Beliefnet. Aside from the many “intellectual property laws, copyright laws, and the like at play here,” what about the “moral and ethical considerations?” It’s a well-known fact that “Salinger is notoriously protective of his work,” and if John David California really is a fan of Salinger’s—as he claims to be—how could he “ever dream of betraying” the author’s wishes? J.D. California should be ashamed of himself for trying to “profit” from “someone else's creation.”
But “when does an iconic image, a shared artistic experience, or a germane public idea shift shape from private and protected to public and open to fair use?” said Vickie Karp in The Huffington Post. The Catcher in the Rye was published over a half-century ago, and it’s “no longer wholly and only” Salinger’s. Unless J.D. California’s book contains “direct, extensive, wholesale and verbatim lifting of the old text with no additional perspective or art,” he’s done nothing wrong.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why China's Communist Party is headed for collapse
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Why Texas Republicans may want to cool the anti-Obama land-grab talk
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- How to make perfect fried rice in 6 easy steps
- Why the poor's investment of choice is so alarming
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Why we need a maximum wage
- Why atheism doesn't have the upper hand over religion
- Obama doesn't have a manhood problem — but conservatives certainly do
Subscribe to the Week