Iranians want change, said Henry Newman in Slate. They may not want “democratic Western-style secularism,” but even a growing number of Iran’s senior ayatollahs see the need to replace President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s Islamic “military dictatorship.” Clerical opposition may not sink Ahmadinejad, at least not yet, but it has “radically undermined” his legitimacy.
Ayatollah Ali Akhbar Hashemi Rafsanjani might have enough clerics on his side to oust Ahmadinejad now, said Ed Morrissey in Hot Air, by unseating his protector, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei. But even if Rafsanjani convinces enough ayatollahs on the Assembly of Experts, which he chairs, to remove arch-rival Khamenei, he doesn’t seem to have “many takers” for his other reforms, like abolishing the supreme leader position altogether.
A “coup from within” the theocratic ruling class or military would be the quickest and least violent way to end this, said Ramin Ahmadi in Forbes, but Iran’s no longer having an “election feud.” It’s having a second “Great Iranian Revolution,” and “the revolution will go on,” no matter what happens among the ruling elite.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Watch out, China — America is working on dogfighting drones
- How liberals are unwittingly paving the way for the legalization of adult incest
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How the Simpsons/Family Guy crossover revealed the worst of both shows
- Why the Chinese military is only a paper dragon
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- Why America won't have enough money to battle ISIS
- The troubling persistence of eugenicist thought in modern America
- Libertarianism's terrible, horrible, no good, very bad idea
- 11 facts yü should know about the umlaut
Subscribe to the Week