"The last-minute demise of a high-profile film project, especially one starring an A-list star" like Brad Pitt, said Michael Cieply in The New York Times, "is Hollywood's equivalent of a bridge collapse." So Sony's recent decision to pull the plug on its "troubled baseball movie," Moneyball, which Steven Soderbergh was set to direct and Pitt was signed on to star in, is a "rare" spectacle—not to mention "painful, expensive, and damaging to all involved."
But it's easy to understand why Sony did it, said Patrick Goldstein in the Los Angeles Times. Soderbergh "delivered a script that was inventive but a radical departure from the film Sony thought he was going to make." The studio became "nervous" that the "end result would be one of Soderbergh's 'experimental' films, like Bubble or The Girlfriend Experience, not one of his more polished gems, like Out of Sight or Ocean's Eleven."
Steven Soderbergh's only crime was striving for authenticity, said Dashiell Bennett in Deadspin. Moneyball is based on Michael Lewis' 2003 nonfiction book about Oakland Athletics general manager Billy Beane, who tried to put together a team on a limited budget, and Soderbergh "didn't want anything in the movie that didn't actually happen. So Billy Beane isn't a sweaty, foul-mouthed, Hooters waitress slayer?" Can you really blame Soderbergh for not wanting to go in that direction?
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- After Ferguson, we don't need another dialogue on race
- 7 grammar rules you really should pay attention to
- A trick for better lunch sandwiches
- Why you should stop believing in evolution
- The government is getting into the fact-checking business. Be very, very afraid.
- The secret to handling pressure like astronauts, Navy SEALs, and samurai
- How Democrats might goad the GOP into shutting down the government
- In defense of Obama's golfing
- Your literary playlist: A guide to the music of Haruki Murakami
- The world is on fire and neither Democrats or Republicans have a clue
Subscribe to the Week