ubna Ahmed Hussein's crime was wearing pants, said Jenice Armstrong in the Philadelphia Daily News. In Sudan, the authorities say that constitutes a violation of public decency laws, so Lubna Hussein and 12 other women were arrested at a Khartoum restaurant July 3. Most of the women accepted 10 lashes, but Hussein and two others chose to face trial and, if convicted, 40 lashes—making them champions in the fight for freedom being waged against "religious extremists."
This is not about the right of a Christian like Lubna Hussein to wear pants despite a law reflecting Muslim tradition, said Nesrine Malik in Britain's Guardian. The real issue is the defiance of these women in the face of the authorities in Sudan. "As with all self-declared Islamic governments, what a woman wears becomes no longer an issue of religious modesty but one of audacity and defiance to a regime's raison d'etre and authority."
To the men who enforce the rules in Sudan, said World Have Your Say, Lubna Hussein is "an enemy of public morals, to be denounced in the letters pages of newspapers and in mosques." She did, after all, defy the "law of the land" and waive her immunity as a United Nations employee so she could make her point in court, daring the government to flog her. That makes her a "heroine" or a criminal, depending on where you stand.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why is American internet so slow?
- 7 ways to be the most interesting person in any room
- What the collapse of the Ming Dynasty can tell us about American decline
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Colorado’s new ‘drive high, get a DUI’ commercials are actually pretty clever
- 22 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Who are the real gay marriage bigots?
- Sorry Belle Knox, porn still oppresses women
- Ukraine's fraught relationship with Russia: A brief history
- Pics or it didn't happen: Millennials are a bunch of selfie-loving skeptics
Subscribe to the Week