"Say what you want about Paula Abdul," said Erin Carlson in the Associated Press, but "she makes for great television." That's why her announcement Tuesday that she's leaving American Idol after eight seasons is so "shocking." Abdul "may be the show's craziest judge, but millions of viewers hung on every garbled sentence just to see what she'll do next"—her departure "raises questions about the future of the Fox franchise."
American Idol "will certainly, in some small way, be diminished" by Paula Abdul's exit, said Mike Hale in The New York Times. But will it "actually hurt the Idol franchise?" Probably not. "The show's ratings have already declined for two consecutive seasons," so it was already in trouble. And any one of the show's judges is "replaceable." American Idol "doesn't need another Paula Abdul—it needs another Kelly Clarkson."
But the judges are a big part of American Idol's appeal, said Marc Hirsh in MSNBC.com, and with Abdul gone, "things are suddenly up in the air. With the chemistry of the judges' table dramatically altered, now is as good a time as any for the show's remaining stars to reflect and make some much-needed changes."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- The U.S. is about to sell weapons to Vietnam. That's bad news for China.
- What the Middle Ages can tell us about the GOP's big charity myth
- Why is the Pentagon stuffing caves in Norway full of tanks?
- The most sensible GOP alternative to ObamaCare comes from a Senate candidate who is almost sure to lose
- 10 things you need to know today: October 23, 2014
- When Khomeini said no to Iranian nukes
- The one thing the New Atheists get right about religion
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- 3 horrific inaccuracies in Homeland's depiction of Islamabad
Subscribe to the Week