almart’s “low prices” are beating Target’s “cheap chic,” said Ben Steverman in BusinessWeek, at least in this recession. Both of the “fiercely competitive” chains benefitted from consumers “trading down,” but Walmart “clearly won out in the past year” in terms of customer traffic and sales. The “crucial question,” of course, is what happens next? And as the economy recovers, things are looking brighter for Target and its “more pleasant” stores.
So long as “the ‘frugalista’ has replaced the ‘fashionista’ in Americans’ recessionary mind-set,” said Jackie Crosby in the Minneapolis Star Tribune, prices are king. And one of the “rays of hope” for Target is that it believes customers are starting to see that its prices are “as good or better” than Walmart’s.
At the same time, Walmart is trying to get “affluent shoppers” in its doors, said Douglas McIntyre in 24/7 Wall Street. Sure, it was “burned” last time it tried that, but times have changed. Walmart is now “riding a tide of positive publicity and strong sales,” and it has “nothing to lose and plenty to gain” by chasing a “new class of shoppers.”
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- 7 ways to be the most interesting person in any room
- Here's proof that Justin Bieber is just as spoiled as you always thought
- Why is it so expensive to build a bridge in America?
- What the collapse of the Ming Dynasty can tell us about American decline
- 22 TV shows to watch in 2014
- The GOP must try to win over African-Americans
- Why is American internet so slow?
- What would a U.S.-China war look like?
Subscribe to the Week