The Justice Department is releasing a 2004 report on CIA prisoner abuse, including new details about brutal interrogations of terrorism suspects—the CIA reportedly threatened prisoners with mock executions, handguns, and power drills. The Justice Department declined to prosecute any cases in 2004, but sources say its ethics office is now recommending reopening a dozen abuse cases. (The New York Times)
What the commentators said
Attorney General Eric Holder “will earn his salary this week,” said Andrew Cohen in CBS News. “As a matter of law, there is no question about what” he “should do”—using “tactics straight out of Scarface” violated even Bush’s “watered-down” torture policies. But “when it comes to politics and law in Washington,” applying the law to facts is rarely that simple.
“Enforcing the law is an important function of government,” said ex-CIA general counsel Jeffrey H. Smith in The Washington Post. But the Obama administration “also has broader responsibilities,” and prosecuting CIA officers now "risks chilling current intelligence operations.” Besides, agents were told harsh “techniques were ‘legal’” under Bush’s “badly flawed” legal memos, and the CIA has already disciplined agents it thinks crossed the line.
Actually, Obama “is said to favor dropping the matter,” said Bobby Ghosh in Time. But if the 2004 report shows that interrogators violated Bush’s legal bounds, or used “borderline torture” before his legal team’s “torture memo” was issued in 2002, “it may be impossible for Obama to hold off Holder’s planned investigation.” And if the CIA report shows that Bush officials forced the techniques on the CIA, it was probably “a tense weekend” for Dick Cheney.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why China's Communist Party is headed for collapse
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Why Texas Republicans may want to cool the anti-Obama land-grab talk
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- Why the poor's investment of choice is so alarming
- How to make perfect fried rice in 6 easy steps
- Obama doesn't have a manhood problem — but conservatives certainly do
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Why atheism doesn't have the upper hand over religion
- Why we need a maximum wage
Subscribe to the Week