Director Ang Lee's "likable, humane" new movie Taking Woodstock "is not an attempt to re-create the epochal Woodstock Music and Art Fair" of 1969, said Stephen Holden in The New York Times. We do get "an immense traffic jam, fields littered with trash, and hippies gleefully sliding through mud," but Lee mainly uses his lead character (played by Demetri Martin) to prove "that contemplation of historic events from the margins can be more revealing than from the hot center" (watch the trailer for Taking Woodstock).
Most of Taking Woodstock "busies itself with the lead-up to the main event," said Anthony Lane in The New Yorker, and "you can't deny the smiling mood that wafts through the film like incense." But unfortunately, "not once does a character's show of feeling stir you, send you, or stop you in your tracks, and the loss is unsustainable."
Taking Woodstock also "proves that the decade is still prone to the laziest, wide-eyed oversimplifications," said Melissa Anderson in The Village Voice. Lee's "facile" movie features "inane, occasionally borderline offensive portrayals of Jews, performance artists, trannies, Vietnam vets, squares, and freaks," and "does nothing more than recycle the same late-'60s tropes seen countless times since the Carter administration."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How the South's ugly racial history is haunting ObamaCare
- The real story behind Deliver Us From Evil
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- If Democrats abandon immigration reform after Tuesday's likely loss, they will turn 2016 into a debacle
- Feast your eyes on this beautiful linguistic family tree
- What if Leo Strauss was right?
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- The culture war finally comes to the Catholic Church
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- Stop making fun of philosophy and read some philosophy
Subscribe to the Week