What we can learn from Abraham Lincoln's greatest mistake
Bipartisanship is overrated
An ill-fated tilt toward bipartisanship was at the core of Abraham Lincoln's greatest mistake.
As the Civil War ground on through 1863 and the presidential election in 1864 approached, Republicans thought restoring the Union under terms of generous reconciliation was a high priority. Thus, Lincoln and the Republican Party nominated Democrat Andrew Johnson to be his running mate under a Union Party ticket, ditching previous running mate Hannibal Hamlin, a reliable anti-slavery Republican.
The idea, of course, was to lend some broad legitimacy to the postwar reconstruction process. But when Lincoln was assassinated by a Confederate terrorist in 1865, that decision turned from dubious to an absolute catastrophe. We should remember Lincoln's mistake today, as centrists browbeat movements on both sides of the aisle for not seeking reconciliation. Sometimes, reaching for compromise is a terrible move.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Andrew Johnson was by a wide margin the worst president in American history. Instead of following Lincoln's ideas of generous but firm reconciliation, with slavery abolished and at least some political rights guaranteed for newly freed slaves, Johnson behaved essentially as a Confederate plant.
A barely-literate, bone-deep racist former slaveowner with a messianic complex, Johnson did all he could to restore the prewar status quo, especially focusing on stamping freed blacks under a white supremacist bootheel. He did nothing as southern states introduced "black codes," which basically enserfed freed blacks in a preview of Jim Crow. When Congress quashed these codes, he vetoed every attempt to achieve any modicum of rights for blacks and then refused to implement such laws when Congress repeatedly overrode him. He fired Republicans from the government on the slightest pretext and stacked the federal bureaucracy and the military with racist Democrats. He pardoned every Confederate soldier en masse. He pardoned three of John Wilkes Booth's co-conspirators.
All of this powerfully enabled a wave of organized white terrorism that swept the South after the end of the war. The newly created Freedmen's Bureau, together with blacks working on their own initiative, strained mightily to uplift and secure the rights of freed slaves. They built schools, churches, and houses; bought property; and organized political conferences across the nation. They were met with a systematic campaign of white terror, including assassination, arson, riots, fraud, and wanton murder, against both free blacks and their white Republican allies, about which Johnson did nothing.
About the only positive thing that can be said about Johnson's presidency is that he was such a stunningly horrible politician that an enraged Congress eventually confronted him head-on. Practically all his vetoes were overridden, and he was impeached when he removed Secretary of War Edwin Stanton (a committed abolitionist) in blatant violation of the Tenure of Office Act, which stipulated the Senate had to approve the removal of high-level executive branch officials.
But despite his impeachment, the vote in the Senate to remove him from office missed by one, and Johnson continued to use the considerable power of the presidency to harm blacks and the nation at large. Indeed, one could argue he was the only actual traitor who has ever been president of United States.
Now, it should be noted that Lincoln was consistently more moderate and conciliatory than true radicals like Thaddeus Stevens or Charles Sumner. But he also had a long history of increasingly enlightened views, and certainly would not have tolerated the campaign of terror mounted by ex-Confederates. Had Lincoln lived, serious scholars argue there would have been a decent chance that Jim Crow could have been headed off at the pass. Instead, in large part because Johnson was a despicable racist (the racism and apathy of northern whites being the other major reason), African-Americans were condemned to a century of slavery in all but name.
The grotesque Andrew Johnson presidency puts the lie to centrist pundit arguments that bipartisanship is the highest political virtue. Sometimes it works out, as when LBJ masterfully guided landmark civil rights legislation through Congress. But sometimes it leads to disaster.
So for today's organizers, politicians, and activists, don't fret if centrist scolds wring their handkerchiefs about a lack of bipartisan support for some policy or the other. Sometimes marshaling one's strength and steamrolling the opposition is the right way to go.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
Duchess of Gloucester: the hard-working royal you've never heard of
Under The Radar Outer royal 'never expected' to do duties but has stepped up to the plate
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Are 'judge shopping' rules a blow to Republicans?
Today's Big Question How the abortion pill case got to the Supreme Court
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Climate change is driving Indian women to choose sterilization
under the radar Faced with losing their jobs, they are making a life-altering decision
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Xi-Biden meeting: what's in it for both leaders?
Today's Big Question Two superpowers seek to stabilise relations amid global turmoil but core issues of security, trade and Taiwan remain
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published