Economic inequality: Is the American dream dying?
President Obama identified the widening wealth gap between rich and poor as the true “defining challenge of our time.”
“Finally!” said Paul Krugman in The New York Times. For years conservative deficit scolds have been proclaiming that the gravest threat to our republic comes from our supposedly “unaffordable” entitlement programs and “crippling” national debt. But President Obama last week identified the widening wealth gap between rich and poor as the true “defining challenge of our time,” and pledged to devote the rest of his second term to addressing it. The top 1 percent of families in the U.S. now have a net worth 288 times that of the average family, Obama reminded us, and the gap keeps growing: In the three years after the 2008 financial crisis, 95 percent of the economic gains went to the top 1 percent. The top 5 percent now control 72 percent of the nation’s wealth. Even worse, an inequality of opportunity now makes it harder than ever for the poor to escape their circumstances. No one’s calling for a Marxist revolution, said David Simon in Guardian.com. “That argument’s over.” But the American dream is dying. “Are we all in this together or are we all not?”
The first step in addressing this crisis is obvious, said Eugene Robinson in The Washington Post. The working poor need to earn more money. That’s why Obama has proposed a sizable hike in the U.S.’s minimum wage of $7.25 an hour. At that “shamefully low” wage, people have to take second jobs just to afford the basic necessities, and still need food stamps and other government aid to get by. “Conservatives howl” every time a minimum-wage hike is discussed, insisting that higher labor costs would result in layoffs and higher unemployment. But the minimum wage is $10 in Britain and Canada, nearly $13 in France, and $14.88 in Australia. The Australian unemployment rate is only 5.7 percent, compared with our 7 percent.
What Americans need are the jobs created by a healthy economy, not more handouts or government intervention, said Glenn Reynolds in USA Today. The ultimate effect of Democratic policies is to trap people in poverty by creating a permanent “dependent class” who have little incentive to try to escape. Class warfare isn’t the answer, either, said Rich Lowry in the New York Post.Yes, America has a serious problem with poverty and economic mobility, but “it has nothing to do with a small fraction of people being spectacularly rich.” If you’re an unemployed single mother trying to raise a family on welfare and food stamps, it makes no difference what CEOs earn. Facebook’s “Mark Zuckerberg could be stripped of all his wealth tomorrow, and it wouldn’t help anyone further down the income ladder.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Class warfare already exists, said Dan Balz in WashingtonPost.com, and it’s the wealthy who are waging and winning it. Americans know it, too. “Sentiment is widespread that something is fundamentally wrong with the way the benefits of the economic system are distributed.” By a 64 to 33 percent margin, Americans say in a new Bloomberg poll that the U.S. no longer offers everyone an equal chance to get ahead. The growing perception that the game is rigged should worry the wealthy, said Frida Ghitis in CNN.com. A nation dogged by “a sense that unfairness permeates the system” is an unstable nation, “and nobody benefits more from stability than the wealthy.” Out of pure self-interest, the rich had better realize that growing inequality “is their fight, too.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Xi-Biden meeting: what's in it for both leaders?
Today's Big Question Two superpowers seek to stabilise relations amid global turmoil but core issues of security, trade and Taiwan remain
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Will North Korea take advantage of Israel-Hamas conflict?
Today's Big Question Pyongyang's ties with Russia are 'growing and dangerous' amid reports it sent weapons to Gaza
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published