Did Joe Biden's bravado debate performance help Obama?
Biden dominated the sole vice-presidential face-off. But that may have turned off many voters
The reaction to the debate between Vice President Joe Biden and challenger Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) is in many ways a mirror image of last week's face-off at the top of the ticket: This time Democrats are uniformly cheering Biden's dominant, energetic performance while Republicans are saying Biden was too amped up and boorish for undecided and independent voters, griping about moderator Martha Raddatz, and arguing that the debate was basically a tie, and that Ryan won on substance or if you listened to the debate on the radio. But if Biden got the better of Ryan, nobody is claiming it was as clean or as big a win as Mitt Romney's over President Obama in their first debate — and of course there's still an active discussion on whether vice-presidential debates even matter. So, did Joe Biden's aggressive, bravado debate performance help Obama recover lost ground?
Yes. He gave Democrats a jolt: Let's start with the obvious: "Biden won the debate," says Michael Tomasky at The Daily Beast. The impact this has on the race probably isn't huge, "but it's real." Biden did exactly what he needed to: He kneecapped Romney, reopened Obama's lead among women, and most importantly, "gave the Democratic base the shot in the arm it desperately needed after last week." I think momentum will now move "mildly back in the Democratic direction." That's not a bad night's work for "a guy who often makes the news only when he says something screwy."
"Biden delivers the needed shot in the arm"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Biden's bullying will actually hurt Obama: We can all agree that "Biden wasn't passive" in the debate, says Jennifer Rubin at The Washington Post. In fact, "he was so aggressive, so rude, and so overbearing" that he must have turned off any undecided voters watching, not to mention women and independents. Meanwhile, "Ryan more than held his own," delivering devastating critiques of the Obama administration. I'm guessing it's Biden's nasty "habit of smirking and laughing and being dismissive" of Ryan that will really hurt Team Obama, though. "The split screen replays will be deadly."
The VP debate changed nothing: Biden's frequent interruptions "likely didn't win him many supporters," says James Rainey at The Los Angeles Times. But Ryan probably didn't "win many hearts, either, when he countered with a bit of snark" about Biden overcompensating for Obama's debate performance. All in all, though, each party will be pleased with its candidate — and nothing in the debate "helped reconfigure the race for the White House." Some voters still have questions, but "their answers will come from the presidential contenders, not their seconds." On to the next presidential debate.
"Biden, Ryan fight won't decide this for either side"
Read more political coverage at The Week's 2012 Election Center.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Pros and cons of solar energy
Pros and cons Solar power could become the primary source of electricity worldwide by 2050 – but there are still clouds in the forecast
By Rebecca Messina, The Week UK Published
-
Post Office's Capture software to be reviewed over 'glitches'
Speed Read Solicitor representing accused postmasters says flaws in the IT system follow 'very similar pattern' to Horizon
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
How would we know if World War Three had started?
Today's Big Question With conflicts in Ukraine, Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific, the 'spark' that could ignite all-out war 'already exists'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published