Tar-sands oil: Should the U.S. say yes?
President Obama must decide whether to allow a $7 billion oil pipeline to be built by TransCanada. The pipeline would carry tar-sands oil from Alberta to Texas.
President Obama is stuck in a moral tar pit, said Mike Tidwell and Cindy Parker in The Baltimore Sun. The president must soon decide the future of a $7 billion oil pipeline, Keystone XL, from Canada to the U.S. The 1,700-mile pipeline, to be built by oil giant TransCanada, requires a federal permit because it would cross the U.S. border while carrying more than 700,000 barrels of tar-sands oil every day from Alberta to Texas refineries. But consider the environmental consequences of feeding our oil addiction this way. The tar sands must be steamed, crushed, and diluted in water before they yield oil—a process that uses far more energy than normal oil production, and would pump vast amounts of carbon dioxide into our already warming atmosphere. And TransCanada—which has a dismal safety record—would run its oil pipeline across 2,000 U.S. rivers and the nation’s largest aquifer. That’s why more than 1,200 protestors descended on the White House last week to implore the president to say no to this looming environmental threat.
Obama would be “crazy” if he turned TransCanada down, said Robert Samuelson in The Washington Post. Building the pipeline would reduce our dependence on a “global oil market threatened by wars [and] revolutions.” If the U.S. rejects Canadian tar-sands oil, Asia or China will gladly buy it, so there would be no net environmental gain. The pipeline would also put Americans to work, said The Washington Examiner in an editorial. TransCanada says building the project would create 20,000 jobs in the U.S., and designing and operating it would add as many as 118,000 “spin-off jobs.” Even labor unions loyal to the Democrats want the pipeline to be built. So why hasn’t Obama already said yes?
It’s because he’s torn, said Andrew C. Revkin in The New York Times. The president doesn’t want to anger environmentalists, but with the U.S. economy stuck “in its own tar pit,” he’s not going to turn down a chance to generate jobs. The smart, long-range policy is to let the pipeline go forward, while pursuing a broader energy policy of “conservation, efficiency, and innovation” that will reduce U.S. oil consumption. If American cars get far better mileage in future years, and if we can develop our own energy resources, then tar-sands oil will become too expensive, and the pipeline “has a good chance of dying on the vine.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
The Week contest: Stick guitar
Puzzles and Quizzes
By The Week US Published
-
'Sports executives ushered a fox into the henhouse'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Disney and DeSantis reach detente
Speed Read The Florida governor and Disney settle a yearslong litigation over control of the tourism district
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Xi-Biden meeting: what's in it for both leaders?
Today's Big Question Two superpowers seek to stabilise relations amid global turmoil but core issues of security, trade and Taiwan remain
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published