“When we meet the enemy we will kill him. We will show him no mercy.” So said Gen. George S. Patton, preparing his troops for the invasion of Sicily in World War II. In a later war, cigar-chomping Gen. Curtis LeMay, a man cut from similarly barbed khaki, threatened to bomb North Vietnam back to the Stone Age. (For anyone tempted to doubt LeMay’s sincerity, Tokyo offered silent reproach; LeMay’s relentless firebombing in 1945 reduced much of the city to cinders.)
War is surely brutal in Iraq and Afghanistan today, as it was in Europe and Indochina in the 20th century. But the tone, and the terms of engagement, seems altogether different. The counterinsurgency approach championed by Gen. David Petraeus emphasizes patience, negotiation, and the slow, steady accumulation of civic and political capital. It relies on a language of construction, not destruction; of cooperation rather than subjugation. As David Brooks wrote recently, officers focus on building communities and suppress the urge to “kill bad guys.” By many accounts, Americans operating in the two countries are wearing their multiple hats and helmets with surprising skill. A first wave of Iraq and Afghanistan vets has already returned home and run for public office, with some winning seats in Congress and state legislatures. More will surely follow. Having searched for common ground among scheming sheiks and suspicious village elders, will they be able to straddle the divide between their blue and red compatriots? Or will compromise and the art of the deal be lost in translation once our military pols go native, adopting new talking points in the language of a new tribe?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
Nuclear near-missesThe Explainer From technical glitches to fateful split-second decisions, the world has come to the brink of nuclear war more times than you might think
-
What is cloud seeding and did it cause Dubai's severe rainfall?The Explainer The future is flooded
-
American Airlines pilots are warning of a 'significant spike' in safety issuesIn the Spotlight The pilot's union listed 'problematic trends' they say are affecting the airline's fleet
-
Editor's letter: Stumbling forward in Syriafeature The idea that there’s a secret order to the chaos around us may offer comfort, but it takes real creativity to conjure up a grand plot for the events around Syria.
-
Editor's letter: War trauma at home
feature In Texas last week, Navy SEAL Chris Kyle, who survived four combat tours, two bullet wounds, and six IED explosions in Iraq became another casualty of war.
-
Editor's letter: Paths to citizenship
feature Washington finally appears to be coalescing around a plan to reform immigration policy.
-
Editor's Letter: Our bargain with the nuclear devil
feature It would be lovely if we could shut all 104 nuclear plants in this country, and the coal- and oil-burning plants, too, and live off solar and wind power.
-
Editor's Letter: Beyond Arizona
feature It’s not just Arizona. When it comes to illegal immigration, the nation is in a foul mood.
-
Editor's Letter
feature From week to week, the most feverish battle between the left and the right isn’t over health-care policy or even the war in Iraq. It’s over who can claim the title of “most outraged.” The right had the upper hand in sputtering indignation for awhile, than