Obama vs. Congress: The politics of ‘no’
Will President Obama and the Republicans find common ground?
“The gloves are off,” said Doyle McManus in the Los Angeles Times. “Hope” and “change” may still be part of President Obama’s rhetorical arsenal, but there’s a new message emanating from the White House, aimed directly at Republicans who have methodically blocked his ambitious agenda: “No more Mr. Nice Guy.” In his State of the Union address last week, Obama pointedly told Senate Republicans that if they are going to insist that 60 votes are needed in the Senate to get anything accomplished in Washington, “then the responsibility to govern is now yours as well.” Two days later, meeting with House Republicans at their retreat in Baltimore, Obama accused his hosts of practicing “the politics of no” and of being more interested in partisan warfare than in solving the nation’s problems. “Let’s start thinking of each other as Americans first,” he said in yet another speech this week. “I don’t want an attitude, ‘If Obama loses, we win.’”
But why would Republicans want to find common ground with Obama? said Jonah Goldberg in National Review Online. For all the talk about Obama’s “pivoting to the center,” he’s a liberal ideologue who’s wedded to a Big Government, big deficit agenda. It’s not just a handful of Republican congressmen who aren’t buying health-care “reform” and bogus “stimulus” spending—it’s most Americans. “At the core of Obama’s trouble is a misreading of the 2008 election,” said Fred Barnes in The Weekly Standard. America is still “a center-right country,” but Obama thought his victory was a mandate for “sweeping initiatives” bringing massive deficit spending and costly caps on emissions, and expanding government bureaucracy. He was wrong, and his plummeting poll numbers prove it.
Obama is indeed in trouble, said Robert Kuttner in The Boston Globe, but your diagnosis is all wrong. His fundamental miscalculation has been—and apparently continues to be—that Republicans are the least bit interested in solving the country’s problems. But Republicans figure their interests are best served by denying Obama any victories whatsoever. They even voted against establishing a bipartisan commission to reduce the deficit, after some Republicans proposed just such a commission. Why knock your head against a “brick wall”? Actually, it’s “good politics” for Obama to embrace bipartisanship, said Colbert King in The Washington Post, because the public is sick of gridlock. But let’s not be naïve. “Republicans don’t want comity; they want the White House. And the way to reach it is by going around, over, or through Obama.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Obama now fully understands that, said Eugene Robinson, also in the Post, which is why he is back in campaign mode, directly addressing his message to the voters. From now on, he’ll position himself as a solutions-seeking “outsider” bashing that “den of iniquity called Washington.” Instead of playing defense, he’s going on offense, and if Republicans keep saying “no,” they’ll risk “sounding truculent and Machiavellian.” There’s one flaw with that strategy, said USA Today in an editorial. The country doesn’t want solutions—at least not solutions that involve any sacrifice. Voters want cheaper and more reliable health insurance, “but not the tradeoffs that would make it possible.” They want jobs, now, but are “wildly critical” of government stimulus spending and big deficits. They want deficit reduction, but not at the cost of higher taxes or cuts in any program that benefits them. Are you listening, Washington? The people have spoken.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Xi-Biden meeting: what's in it for both leaders?
Today's Big Question Two superpowers seek to stabilise relations amid global turmoil but core issues of security, trade and Taiwan remain
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Will North Korea take advantage of Israel-Hamas conflict?
Today's Big Question Pyongyang's ties with Russia are 'growing and dangerous' amid reports it sent weapons to Gaza
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published