Issue of the week: Obama meets the bankers
President Obama summoned the leaders of the nation’s biggest banks to scold them for their reluctance to lend and their resistance to tighter regulation.
The scene around the White House conference table spoke volumes about “the balance of power between Wall Street and Washington,” said Andrew Ross Sorkin in The New York Times. President Obama this week summoned the leaders of the nation’s biggest banks—whom he had called “fat cats” during a 60 Minutes interview just the day before—to scold them for their reluctance to lend and their resistance to tighter regulation. But the heads of three of the most important banks were “conspicuously absent.” True, Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, Morgan Stanley Chairman John Mack, and Citigroup Chairman Richard Parsons “seemed genuinely disappointed” that their early-morning flights from New York had been grounded by fog. They participated instead via conference call. But their nonattendance suggested that with the financial crisis now ebbing, banks no longer need—or fear—the White House. After all, “if the meeting were really that important,” the execs “would have found a way to get there.”
They didn’t miss much, said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. Obama called the meeting because he sensed “a political opening” to bash bankers, but he managed only to highlight his administration’s incoherent response to the sputtering economic recovery. The administration “says it wants banks to lend more money,” but then it turns around and threatens “to punish bankers if they make too many bad loans.” Never mind that more lending would only invite a replay of the credit crisis, said Investor’s Business Daily. “Our current economic ills are largely due to just the kind of government meddling” that was on display at the meeting. The government has a long and sorry record of pressuring banks to make dubious loans, such as all those mortgages for low-income borrowers. Lest we forget, “this is how the subprime meltdown, the source of our current financial troubles, came about.”
Obama may have made “mean” noises about bankers on TV the night before, but his meeting with them was a “lovefest,” according to some in attendance, said Charles Gasparino in the New York Post. Perhaps the president pulled his punches because he knows his own administration is responsible for returning bank earnings to “megabonus levels.” Banks can make a tidy profit simply by borrowing from the Federal Reserve for next to nothing, then investing the proceeds in higher-yielding Treasury bonds. Thanks to that strategy, “Wall Street has bounced back from the dead,” even while the rest of the nation suffers. Although that’s infuriating, the blame lies not with the banks but with “their enablers in government,” including Obama.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
To be fair, Obama doesn’t have a lot of options, said Massimo Calabresi in Time. With little real leverage over the financial sector, Obama must “alternately threaten and plead with banks to open their purse strings.” Obama can’t afford to crack down much harder. With unemployment in double digits and housing prices still in the dumps, the nation desperately needs the capital that the banks alone control. “The president has real problems only the banks can help him solve.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
'Republicans want to silence Israel's opponents'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Poland, Germany nab alleged anti-Ukraine spies
Speed Read A man was arrested over a supposed Russian plot to kill Ukrainian President Zelenskyy
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - April 19, 2024
Cartoons Friday's cartoons - priority delivery, USPS on fire, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published