Waffling over Afghanistan
President Obama has scheduled multiple meetings with analysts, diplomats, soldiers, and scholars to hear various views on what to do about Afghanistan.
The Obama administration can’t decide what to do about Afghanistan, said Christoph von Marschall in Germany’s Der Tagesspiegel. The president and his national security advisors are now engaged “in open debate” over whether to send more troops—and, if so, whether
to concentrate them in the cities or spread them across the country. The president has scheduled multiple meetings with analysts, diplomats, soldiers, and scholars to hear various views. The military, of course, wants more troops. But others “have been drawing parallels to Vietnam.” There, too, the generals kept demanding more troops and the White House kept complying, and the whole endeavor ended in disaster. That’s why the Obama administration is correctly giving the matter so much thought. “The decision on troops can only come after a careful analysis.”
But the military is getting impatient, said Alex Spillius in Britain’s Daily Telegraph. The commander of forces in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, gave a speech in London last week warning against a long delay in a new troop deployment. “This effort will not remain winnable indefinitely, and nor will public support,” he said. McChrystal also pointedly noted that relying on drone strikes—the approach favored by Vice President Joe Biden—would turn the country into “Chaosistan.” The general’s outspokenness “shocked and angered presidential advisors,” and the very next day, Obama summoned McChrystal to an “awkward” meeting aboard Air Force One in Copenhagen, where the president was lobbying for Chicago’s Olympic bid.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The Republicans loved McChrystal’s remarks, said Corine Lesnes in France’s Le Monde. Indeed, for the right wing, McChrystal “has replaced David Petraeus in the role of miracle general.” But then, Americans of both parties tend to revere their military figures. Before Petraeus it was Gen. John Abizaid, who was described admiringly as an Arabist educated at Harvard—just the person to solve the Iraq mess once and for all. He failed to do so, of course. Now, McChrystal is getting the star treatment from the U.S. press, which marvels at his “ascetic regime of just one meal a day” and harps on the fact that it was his unit that captured Saddam Hussein. This lionization lends McChrystal’s recommendation for more troops great weight with the American people, with many columnists now warning of a quagmire unless the general gets the troops he wants.
Europeans, at least, should hold off on sending more troops, said Germany’s Dresdner Neueste Nachrichten in an editorial. The U.S. has long been pushing for Germany to beef up its contingent in Afghanistan, and now that our elections have given us a more conservative government, there’s even more pressure for additional deployments. But it’s unclear what their mission would be. Obama “continues to wait for enlightenment”—and the world waits with him.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
Liz Truss to save the West: is a political comeback really on the cards?
Talking Point The former prime minister is back with a new tell-all memoir
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Fallout: one of the 'most faithful – and best – video game adaptations'
The Week Recommends This 'genre-bending' new Amazon series is set in a post-apocalyptic wilderness where survivors shelter below ground
By Adrienne Wyper, The Week UK Published
-
'Test of faith for Trump Media's investors'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published