Guantánamo: Not so easily closed
White House officials admitted they wouldn’t be able to close the military prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, by President Obama’s January 2010 deadline.
For the Obama administration, it’s a heaping helping of “humble pie,” said Michael Goldfarb in TheWeeklyStandard.com. White House officials admitted last week they wouldn’t be able to close the military prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, by President Obama’s January 2010 deadline. Obama’s aides are blaming the Bush administration for keeping messy records on the 223 remaining detainees, the international community for refusing to accept but a handful of them, and even the American people, who rose up in opposition to settling hardened al Qaida killers in U.S. prisons. Closing Guantánamo by year’s end isn’t the only promise Obama is breaking, said Charles Stimson in National Review. He is also now backing out of his campaign pledge to ask Congress for legislation creating a legal basis for holding accused terrorists indefinitely. Instead, the administration will let decisions about the fate of individual detainees fall to the federal courts, allowing Obama to sidestep responsibility when scores of detainees are released. What a “stunning display of political cowardice.”
It’s a “sham” all right, said Glenn Greenwald in Salon.com, but not because Obama is secretly hoping to set detainees free. His administration has submitted legal briefs embracing the discredited “Bush/Cheney/McCain arguments” that terrorism suspects “lack any constitutional rights whatsoever.” It’s now clear that the White House intends merely to move many of the Guantánamo detainees to some other lawless hell—maybe Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan—where they will continue to be held indefinitely without charge. As a symbol of the Bush administration’s contempt for the Constitution, Guantánamo should surely be closed. But why close it only to re-create its “defining traits—indefinite detentions with no trials”—at another location?
So don’t close it, said Anne Marie Dew in The Christian Science Monitor. I’ve just visited Guantánamo, and it’s certainly a “dreadful place,” defined by barbed wire, leg and hand shackles, and occasional outbursts of “piercing hatred” from powerless inmates. But many of those inmates are sworn enemies of the U.S., and we have to put them somewhere. The best place is Gitmo, a remote and secure location that also now has “the most highly secured, most technologically advanced courtroom in the world.” The legal and moral problems associated with detaining enemy combatants will continue to vex us no matter where these prisoners are located. “There is no geographic cure for Gitmo.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
Antony Gormley's Time Horizon – a 'judgmental army' of 100 cast-iron men
The Week Recommends Sculptures are 'everymen questioning the privilege of their surroundings' at the Norfolk stately home
By Adrienne Wyper, The Week UK Published
-
'King's horses take free rein through London'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
Is pop music now too reliant on gossip?
Talking Point Taylor Swift's new album has prompted a flurry of speculation over who she is referring to in her songs
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published