Obama: The most polarizing president ever?
According to a new Pew poll, the gap between Obama’s approval rating among Democrats and Republicans is 61 points, 10 points higher than George W. Bush’s “approval gap” in April 2001.
When he was running for president, Barack Obama promised a new era of “postpartisanship” in which conservative views would be respected and integrated into the government. That vow was just a lot of feel-good, empty rhetoric, said Karl Rove in The Wall Street Journal, and nearly 100 days into Obama’s presidency, the proof is now in. A new Pew poll finds that the gap between Obama’s approval rating among Democrats (88 percent) and Republicans (27 percent) is 61 points—10 points wider than George W. Bush’s “approval gap” in April 2001. And it’s no wonder. From his inaugural address to last week’s trip to Europe, Obama has gratuitously criticized Bush and pursued a far-left agenda. “A decisive leader is sometimes a divisive leader,” said Michael Gerson in The Washington Post. But Obama didn’t have to be this way. “It would have been relatively easy” for him to win over some Republicans with “genuine outreach.” Instead, on the $787 billion stimulus bill, the $3.6 trillion federal budget, and a host of other policy proposals, “Republicans were flattened, not consulted.”
“Context, please,” said John Dickerson in Slate.com. These poll results have little to do with Obama’s policies or treatment of Republicans. As the director of the Pew poll himself pointed out, “political parties have become more partisan over the last 30 years,” with the post-inauguration gap in approval ratings increasing from Richard Nixon’s 29 points to Bill Clinton’s 45 points to George W. Bush’s 51 points. Besides, polls from previous decades prove that “Republicans tend to be less generous” in judging new presidents of the opposite party.
That’s especially true now that the GOP has shrunk to an angry, frightened rump, said Andrew Sullivan in the London Sunday Times. Only 24 percent of voters now identify themselves as Republicans, and most of them are blind followers of Rush Limbaugh and Fox News, which daily proclaim the new president to be a socialist, fascist, anti-American radical. Thus, it’s hardly surprising that “Republican hostility has soared.” Meanwhile, the number of Americans who believe the country is on the “right track” has grown from 26 percent when Obama took office to 40 percent—and it’s “rising steadily.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Maybe so, said David Broder in The Washington Post, but the White House would be foolish to conclude that polarization is cost-free. “The fastest-growing portion of the electorate consists of people who have no strong partisan allegiance.” These critical swing voters—comprising 30 percent of the electorate—distrust both doctrinaire liberals and doctrinaire conservatives, and what impresses them are pragmatic policies that have support in both parties. So in the long run, “it will continue to behoove Obama to woo Republican help—no matter how tough the odds.”
It really wouldn’t be that tough, said Michael Goodwin in the New York Daily News. As Obama showed during his recent trip to the G-20 summit meeting in Europe, he does have a talent for building consensus among rivals. When the leaders of France and China were at odds over tax policy, “Obama cut a deal that left both men satisfied and grateful.” Later, speaking to a youthful audience in France, Obama bluntly told them, “Don’t fool yourselves” about the nature of terrorism and al Qaida’s determination to kill Westerners—no matter who is president. Leading by example and challenging supporters’ illusions—“that’s the Obama we desperately need at home.”
In the end, though, it all comes down to policy, said Kenneth T. Walsh in USNews.com. Obama’s proposals to overhaul the health-care system and reduce carbon emissions, and his trillion-dollar deficits, are bound to alienate Republicans and even many independents. So what? said Gerald F. Seib in The Wall Street Journal Online. Brookings Institution scholar Pietro S. Nivola maintains that our current polarization may be a good thing, creating a kind of “parliamentary democracy” in which the two parties stand clearly for a distinctly different philosophy of governance. Voters can now be pretty certain, for example, that if Democrats win the White House and majorities in Congress, they will pursue universal health-care coverage, increase tax rates on the wealthy, and seek consensus abroad. If Republicans win, taxes on the top wage earners will drop, and foreign policy will be more aggressive. If voters don’t like the results of these policies, “they can throw the rascals out.” Besides, “heightened partisanship” has one more benefit: It has made our “elections more interesting.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
'A direct, protracted war with Israel is not something Iran is equipped to fight'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - April 17, 2024
Cartoons Wednesday's cartoons - political anxiety, jury sorting hat, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Arid Gulf states hit with year's worth of rain
Speed Read The historic flooding in Dubai is tied to climate change
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published