Why every 2016 candidate will go soft-focus in their quest for authenticity
Hillary Clinton is airing her first ad of the 2016 season. Without even watching, you probably know what it contains.
Like the swallows returning to Capistrano, the campaign ads return to Manchester and Des Moines every four years. The airwaves become heavy with the weight of so many messages approved so sincerely, and the owners of local TV stations start wondering whether it's finally time to buy that yacht. And lo, with a mere six months before the New Hampshire and Iowa contests, Hillary Clinton is airing her first ads of the 2016 election. They're full of both warmth and grit, an appreciation for what came before even as her gaze sets upon the future, and all sorts of other inspiring stuff.
This is how ad campaigns usually begin, with spots meant to illuminate some parts of the candidate's biography. The ingredients are always similar, no matter the candidate or party: modest beginnings, important lessons from an elder (often a parent or grandparent who will impart the timeless wisdom that if the future candidate works hard enough, she can go as far as her ambitions and this great country will take her), a lifetime of accomplishment, and a firm connection to regular folks.
Clinton does not disappoint. Let's take a look at the first one:
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"My mom was terrific" is not exactly a controversial stance to take, but it shows that Clinton's campaign is not going to worry too much about making her look "tough" in the way her 2008 campaign did. Clinton needs to impart biographical information less than most candidates do, since she's been a national figure for more than two decades. But her campaign wants you to understand not just the what — that Clinton is an advocate for ordinary people — but the why, which is that it's because of her mother. It's never too early to start getting people feeling warm and fuzzy about you, to "humanize" you and make you "real" and "authentic."
I put all that in quotation marks because every good candidate knows that the press is positively obsessed with authenticity — who has it, who lacks it, how it's communicated, and how it might be faked more convincingly. They long ago decided that unlike her husband, Clinton lacks this most important of virtues, which is why she supposedly doesn't "connect" with your average Joes and Janes. It's worth noting that her old boss Barack Obama was also said to lack that connection, particularly with blue-collar whites, which for some reason didn't stop him from getting elected and re-elected.
But what happened to Clinton between being at her mother's knee and today? Funny you should ask:
"I believe that when families are strong, America is strong." Fair enough. I believe that, too! So does everyone, at least in some way, and that's part of the idea of an ad like this one. We're supposed to say, "Huh, I guess Hillary Clinton is a lot like me and people I know and care for." Much of every campaign is an attempt to convince us of this.
Or it might be more accurate to say that what we're supposed to be convinced of is that the candidate is just like us — only better. They understand us, they struggled the way we have, they think the same things we do and see the world the same way we do. But they're also smarter, more accomplished, more virtuous, and even more modest than we could hope to be. They're us, but versions of ourselves embodied more in aspiration than reality.
Authenticity is always an act; it's just that some politicians are better actors than others. No one is their real authentic self when the cameras are rolling, if there even is such a thing. At the same time, candidates for even the highest office are actual human beings — people who had moms, grew up, got some things right and some other things wrong, and somehow arrived at the point where they decided to run for president. It doesn't hurt to be reminded of that now and again, so long as we remember that it's true of all of them. So if you're trying to figure out which one to vote for, you'd do better by asking what they'd actually do, not whether their personal story is appealing.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Paul Waldman is a senior writer with The American Prospect magazine and a blogger for The Washington Post. His writing has appeared in dozens of newspapers, magazines, and web sites, and he is the author or co-author of four books on media and politics.
-
The de-extinction process to bring woolly mammoths back to life
Under the Radar Biotechnology start-up's stem cell research brings possibility of genetically engineered species a step closer
By Austin Chen, The Week UK Published
-
Today's political cartoons - March 17, 2024
Cartoons Sunday's cartoons - history repeating, the Pope's white flag, and more
By The Week US Published
-
The Week Unwrapped: Derelict homes, Welsh mines, and vinyl
Podcast What can we do about abandoned property? Are old mines still doing us harm? And what do LP sales tell us about the economy?
By The Week Staff Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Xi-Biden meeting: what's in it for both leaders?
Today's Big Question Two superpowers seek to stabilise relations amid global turmoil but core issues of security, trade and Taiwan remain
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Will North Korea take advantage of Israel-Hamas conflict?
Today's Big Question Pyongyang's ties with Russia are 'growing and dangerous' amid reports it sent weapons to Gaza
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published