Donald Trump's collision course with Republicans
The president-elect's policies could quickly meet with some surprising opposition
No doubt President-elect Donald Trump will face his share of unexpected procedural hiccups as he begins his four-year term on Jan. 20.
Doubtless, too, that his focus at the start of his term will not be the focus at the end of it. Events tend to change what a president can do.
Last Wednesday, Trump offered a smorgasbord of proposals, some of them specific, some of them vague. Given his campaign rhetoric, these will be easy for opponents to caricature: Mass deportations! Millions losing health care immediately! Trade wars!
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The reality is that the pace of change, even at the speed of Trump, will slow considerably as it strains through the grind of Washington. The press will not let up in its newly found, if somewhat tarnished, role as truth-teller. The gaps and inconsistencies in his policy proposals, which were back-seated to coverage of his personality and professional history, will become more salient. And Trump might pretend to ignore the equally-as-tarnished opinion polls, but if he is human, he will pay close attention to them.
He has several gating ideas: He'll protect workers, clean up Washington, and restore law and order.
Trump will want a major victory early. A successful Supreme Court nominee, from a list he has already provided, might give him breathing room with conservatives who mistrust him, as will the inevitable fevered, ultimately futile opposition from Democrats. Their opposition to his political appointees will be as implacable as Republican opposition was to President Obama's, and Democrats will be under intense pressure from their base to try and disrupt any traction that Trump might generate from early and easy confirmations.
The new president will need more to generate real momentum: a big domestic policy accomplishment. In the abstract, he can count on the support of his entire party. On a concrete level, he might find that Republicans cut from a different part of the cloth will offer him surprising resistance. His mandate might not be theirs. He might decide on something that commands majority support from a cross-section of Americans. He is fickle that way.
Repealing and replacing ObamaCare will take a while. Some provisions of the bill haven't kicked in yet, and the Affordable Care Act's reach extends to dozens of government agencies, and into state governments. It has metastasized; it cannot be extricated from the body politic like a benign tumor. A number of Republicans want ObamaCare to slowly starve itself to death, exhausting the available supply of governments funds over the course of several years. Its protections remain widely popular and the prospect of many of Trump's own voters going without health insurance will slow down the pace of reform, perhaps considerably. By the end of next year, the American health care system will look a lot different than it does now. How Trump gets rid of ObamaCare while keeping his promise to cover everyone is a mystery at the moment.
In theory, it will be easy, with command of Congress and the White House, to pass a budget. Republicans will roll over and deal with the deficits that Trump's proposals will create because the GOPers overwhelmingly favor the huge tax cuts that will accompany them. But what if that budget contains significant new spending for infrastructure projects? Many House Republicans will face significant pressure to fight against government spending tooth and nail. Senate Republicans will chafe against Medicaid cuts, which would hurt the poor.
On immigration, Senate Republicans already support spending money to build a border wall; they've been appropriating it for years under President Obama. But the predicate to that, which Trump has established in hints, is a more comprehensive immigration plan that could generate support from Democrats in offering a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. It is not clear that the votes are there. Similarly, although he can ask Congress to cut funding for "Sanctuary Cities" — which protect undocumented immigrants by policy — it would pass only as a standalone bill. When merged with Trump's more controversial proposals, it becomes a bargaining chip.
Trump wants to establish term limits on members of Congress. That's a non-starter, even if Congress reads the election tea leaves the way that Trump does. Other proposals to "drain the swamp" — including bans on foreign lobbying and measures to curtail special interest influence over politicians — could sail through.
Some of his plans might draw support from unusual allies. Bernie Sanders pledged to renegotiate bad trade deals and to officially label China a currency manipulator. Many Democrats, and some Republicans, support both of those actions. But most conservatives remain enthusiastic free traders.
So much depends on how Trump gets along with Paul Ryan, assuming the Wisconsin Republican remains speaker of the House. They share some concerns — the size of government and infrastructure investment are two — but their minds diverge elsewhere. Ryan and Trump have profoundly different approaches to criminal justice reform, for example.
And both will be held accountable to vastly different publics. Their interests might overlap simply in the vein of both wanting to do something, and in the need that both have to show that they can work together. Will Ryan, who represents the swamp that Trump wants drained, feel empowered if he retains his speakership? How much of a mandate will Trump claim?
Republicans may well come to understand that Trump won because Hilary Clinton lost (indeed, she was, in the end, a more popular candidate). As much as they need Trump's voters — and the anger of those voters — to sustain their political careers, they will be aware of its limits.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Marc Ambinder is TheWeek.com's editor-at-large. He is the author, with D.B. Grady, of The Command and Deep State: Inside the Government Secrecy Industry. Marc is also a contributing editor for The Atlantic and GQ. Formerly, he served as White House correspondent for National Journal, chief political consultant for CBS News, and politics editor at The Atlantic. Marc is a 2001 graduate of Harvard. He is married to Michael Park, a corporate strategy consultant, and lives in Los Angeles.
-
Today's political cartoons - March 16, 2024
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - pointed commentary, Haiti in trouble, and more
By The Week US Published
-
5 hilarious cartoons about the RNC's MAGA takeover
Cartoons Artists take on RNC funding, Lara Trump, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Trump's presidential run: a bad bet for Republicans?
Talking Point The GOP is taking a 'big gamble' on former president's 2024 White House bid
By The Week UK Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Xi-Biden meeting: what's in it for both leaders?
Today's Big Question Two superpowers seek to stabilise relations amid global turmoil but core issues of security, trade and Taiwan remain
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Will North Korea take advantage of Israel-Hamas conflict?
Today's Big Question Pyongyang's ties with Russia are 'growing and dangerous' amid reports it sent weapons to Gaza
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published