Trump's cover-up in Afghanistan
How the Trump administration is hiding the truth about the Afghanistan surge from the American people
The U.S. military is losing in Afghanistan, and the Trump administration is covering up the extent of the failure.
That is the only possible conclusion from the news that the Pentagon, for the first time, is now redacting portions of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) reports detailing yet another few months of fiasco. "This is the first time SIGAR has been specifically instructed not to release information marked 'unclassified' to the American taxpayer," an agency spokesperson noted in a statement last week.
When thinking about lost American wars, my mind inevitably turns to how America treats its soldiers and veterans when they aren't getting shot at or blown up.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Take the Super Bowl, for instance, which prominently worships the troops. The hyper-patriotic opening ceremonies, with the gigantic flag and the national anthem and the soldiers (for which the Pentagon often pays handsomely, it should be noted) are present in all NFL games, of course, but they reach a sort of paroxysm of hysterical nationalism at the Super Bowl. And that, of course, is only the tip of a vast cultural iceberg of Thank You For Your Service at airports, restaurants, movies, and myriad other public events.
But the rhetorical grandiosity of the troop worship in American society seems roughly inversely proportional to the actual care and consideration shown to veterans in real life. They do have the Department of Veterans Affairs, which is chronically underfunded but at least mostly functional. But there is no broader welfare state to help homeless veterans, and the VA is still falling short when it comes to PTSD and suicide. (Vets who served in Iraq or Afghanistan between 2001-07, for instance, face a roughly 40-60 percent increased risk of suicide compared to the American average.)
Because when it comes to the most important decision one can possibly make about soldiers — when and how to send them to get shot at and blown up — the actual American attitude is a sort of bored, apathetic callousness.
The American polity barely blinked when President Trump announced he was going to try the exact same surge strategy in Afghanistan that failed under Obama and failed under Bush, only smaller. The Republican Party stood squarely behind him, of course, but many Democratic Party elites could barely muster a call for a congressional vote; only a handful attacked Trump's strategy as stupid and wrong.
And now what is the result of a year of mini-surge? American casualties have doubled from a year ago, and the country is no more fundamentally stable than it was in 2016 or 2006. The SIGAR statement blackly notes that among the things the Pentagon is keeping hidden is the "number of districts, and the population living in them, controlled or influenced by the Afghan government or by the insurgents, or contested by both," and that "[f]or the second consecutive quarter, [the Department of Defense] also classified or otherwise restricted information SIGAR had previously reported including such fundamental metrics of ANDSF performance as casualties, attrition, and most capability assessments."
In other words, they are keeping secret whether the occupation is a success or failure — and there's only one realistic possibility as to which option is being concealed.
From the very start of the Afghanistan occupation, the major problem has always been that the American military is not a particularly effective tool for accomplishing a top-to-bottom overhaul of an entire society halfway around the world. The task amounts to forcing several hundred years of history down the throats of an understandably not-very-trusting population in the literal graveyard of empires. It's about as close to fundamentally impossible as can be imagined.
The level of pain and death inflicted on the population of Afghanistan is, of course, two orders of magnitude at least worse than that suffered by American soldiers. The biggest reason by far to end the war in Afghanistan immediately is that the occupation is clearly fueling the conflict more than ending it. But if Americans can't be bothered to pay attention to dead Afghan children, they might at least try to care about their own soldiers.
The truth is that American lives are being wasted over there, and the Trump administration is lying about it.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
Quiz of The Week: 13 - 19 April
Puzzles and Quizzes Have you been paying attention to The Week's news?
By Rebecca Messina, The Week UK Published
-
'Colleges warn of punishment for disruptions'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
Peter Murrell: Sturgeon's husband charged over SNP 'embezzlement' claims
Speed Read SNP expresses 'shock' as former chief executive rearrested in long-running investigation into claims of mishandled campaign funds
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
Sudan on brink of collapse after a year of war
Speed Read 18 million people face famine as the country continues its bloody downward spiral
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How powerful is Iran?
Today's big question Islamic republic is facing domestic dissent and 'economic peril' but has a vast military, dangerous allies and a nuclear threat
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US, Israel brace for Iran retaliatory strikes
Speed Read An Iranian attack on Israel is believed to be imminent
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How green onions could swing South Korea's election
The Explainer Country's president has fallen foul of the oldest trick in the campaign book, not knowing the price of groceries
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Ukraine's battle to save Kharkiv from Putin's drones
The Explainer Country's second-largest city has been under almost daily attacks since February amid claims Russia wants to make it uninhabitable
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
India elections 2024: the logistics of world's biggest vote
The Explainer More than 10% of the world's population is registered for a historic democratic exercise, with PM Modi likely to dominate again
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Erdogan set back in key regional elections
Speed Read The main opposition party flipped or held Turkey's biggest cities, including Istanbul
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Will Aukus pact survive a second Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question US, UK and Australia seek to expand 'game-changer' defence partnership ahead of Republican's possible return to White House
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published