- Whoa, if true May 14
So suggests Ken Auletta at The New Yorker:
Several weeks ago, I'm told, Abramson discovered that her pay and her pension benefits as both executive editor and, before that, as managing editor, were considerably less than the pay and pension benefits of Bill Keller, the male editor whom she replaced in both jobs. "She confronted the top brass," one close associate said, and this may have fed into the management's narrative that she was "pushy," a characterization that, for many, has an inescapably gendered aspect.... Whether Abramson was right or wrong, both sides were left unhappy. [The New Yorker]
Earlier today, Abramson was abruptly pushed out after serving for nearly three years as the paper's top editor, leaving many questions unanswered.- -
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How our botched understanding of 'science' ruins everything
- The science of sex: 4 harsh truths about dating and mating
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- How to be the star of a cocktail party where you don't know anyone
- California's epic drought
- 13 Urban Outfitters controversies
- 11 scientific studies that will restore your faith in humanity
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
Subscribe to the Week