- Correlation does not imply causation May 15
No, it doesn't. There is no connection between spending on science, space, and technology and suicides by hanging, strangulation and suffocation, and no logical argument to think that there would be. So although this graph shows that the two things are correlated, it is an example of a spurious correlation:
If a very large number of monkeys randomly strike keys on a typewriter for a very large amount of time, one will eventually produce a Shakespeare play. And similarly, if you dig around in data enough, you will eventually find things that look to be connected, which obviously aren't.
Another of my favorite examples of spurious correlation is usage of Internet Explorer versus the U.S. murder rate:
And the number people who drowned by falling into a swimming-pool against the number of films Nicolas Cage appeared in:
Spurious correlations are the reason why having a consistent, logical theory is important. If you think one thing is being caused by another and have data to show the two are connected, to make a credible case you need to be able to explain why they are connected, and give a theory that makes testable predictions about the relationship between the two things.- - John Aziz
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How the South's ugly racial history is haunting ObamaCare
- 10 things you need to know today: October 31, 2014
- If Democrats abandon immigration reform after Tuesday's likely loss, they will turn 2016 into a debacle
- Beware of Splenda: The backlash against artificial sugars
- Stop making fun of philosophy and read some philosophy
- What if Leo Strauss was right?
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- Feast your eyes on this beautiful linguistic family tree
Subscribe to the Week