<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Week: Most Recent energy-issues</title><link>http://theweek.com/supertopic/index/83/energy-issues</link><description>Most recent posts.</description><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:15:00 -0500</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:15:00 -0500</lastBuildDate><item><title>Is America on the verge of becoming the world&#039;s biggest oil producer?</title><link>http://theweek.com/article/index/236273/is-america-on-the-verge-of-becoming-the-worlds-biggest-oil-producer</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theweek.com/article/index/236273/is-america-on-the-verge-of-becoming-the-worlds-biggest-oil-producer</guid><description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://media.theweek.com/img/dir_0086/43397_article_main/employees-of-cabot-oil-and-gas-work-on-a-natural-gas-valve-at-a-hydraulic-fracturing-site-in-south.jpg?174&quot; /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;p1&quot;&gt;This week, the Paris-based International Energy Agency reported that &lt;strong&gt;the U.S. would surpass Saudi Arabia as the world&#039;s biggest oil producer by 2020&lt;/strong&gt;, thanks to a fracking revolution that has opened up oil and natural gas reservoirs long trapped in layers of shale rock. The IEA says the U.S. is on track to produce 11.1 million barrels of oil per day by 2020. That&#039;s 500,000 more than Saudi Arabia, currently the world&#039;s largest oil producer.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;p1&quot;&gt;The IEA said the development is evidence that the global energy map &quot;is being redrawn&quot; by the advent of fracking. Short for hydraulic fracturing, fracking...&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://theweek.com/article/index/236273/is-america-on-the-verge-of-becoming-the-worlds-biggest-oil-producer&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator>The Week</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:15:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Obama&#039;s 54-mile-per-gallon fuel standards: Extreme?</title><link>http://theweek.com/article/index/232541/obamas-54-mile-per-gallon-fuel-standards-extreme</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theweek.com/article/index/232541/obamas-54-mile-per-gallon-fuel-standards-extreme</guid><description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://media.theweek.com/img/dir_0082/41315_article_main/under-team-obamas-ambitious-new-fuel-efficiency-standards-car-owners-would-save-some-8000-in-gas.jpg?174&quot; /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;p1&quot;&gt;The Obama administration has&amp;nbsp;finalized&amp;nbsp;its new standards for cars and light trucks, mandating that automakers double the average fuel efficiency of their fleets to 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025. The ambitious rules &amp;mdash; negotiated at length between the Environmental Protection Agency, 13 automakers, auto unions, and environmental groups &amp;mdash; represent the most important step ever taken to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil, says President Obama. The White House predicts the new rules will cut greenhouse gas emissions of cars and light trucks in half by 2025, while saving consumers...&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://theweek.com/article/index/232541/obamas-54-mile-per-gallon-fuel-standards-extreme&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator>The Week</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:09:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Deepwater Horizon: Is Hollywood exploiting the BP oil spill?</title><link>http://theweek.com/article/index/231145/deepwater-horizon-is-hollywood-exploiting-the-bp-oil-spill</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theweek.com/article/index/231145/deepwater-horizon-is-hollywood-exploiting-the-bp-oil-spill</guid><description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://media.theweek.com/img/dir_0081/40584_article_main/fire-boats-battle-the-blazing-remnants-of-the-deepwater-horizon-in-april-2010-hollywood-is-making-a.jpg?174&quot; /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hollywood is gearing up to make a major movie about the explosion that destroyed the Deepwater Horizon oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico in April 2010. The resulting gusher of oil that erupted on the sea floor created one of the biggest environmental disasters in U.S. history, but is the infamous BP oil spill really appropriate fodder for a big-screen thriller? Here, a brief guide:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;They&#039;re really making a movie about the spill?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Not exactly. The script for the project, which is currently titled &lt;em&gt;Deepwater Horizon&lt;/em&gt;, reportedly focuses on members of the drilling crew as they first battled the blowout of the...&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://theweek.com/article/index/231145/deepwater-horizon-is-hollywood-exploiting-the-bp-oil-spill&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator>The Week</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 07:03:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Did Obama push Canada into China&#039;s arms by rejecting the Keystone Pipeline?</title><link>http://theweek.com/article/index/231023/did-obama-push-canada-into-chinas-arms-by-rejecting-the-keystone-pipeline</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theweek.com/article/index/231023/did-obama-push-canada-into-chinas-arms-by-rejecting-the-keystone-pipeline</guid><description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://media.theweek.com/img/dir_0081/40550_article_main/president-obama-and-canadian-prime-minister-stephen-harper-during-a-white-house-press-conference.jpg?174&quot; /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;p1&quot;&gt;Has China swooped in to claim a prize the U.S. forfeited? This week, China&#039;s state-run energy giant CNOOC&amp;nbsp;announced that it was buying Canadian oil producer Nexen for $15 billion, the largest-ever acquisition by a Chinese company. The deal would give China control over Nexen&#039;s oil sands operations in the Canadian province of Alberta (among other Nexen oil properties around the world), a huge win for the energy-hungry nation. The purchase still needs to be approved by Canada&#039;s parliament, which has blocked foreign takeovers of domestic businesses in the past. However, analysts say the odds...&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://theweek.com/article/index/231023/did-obama-push-canada-into-chinas-arms-by-rejecting-the-keystone-pipeline&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator>The Week</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:25:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>The trials and tribulations of America&#039;s natural gas king: A guide</title><link>http://theweek.com/article/index/229080/the-trials-and-tribulations-of-americas-natural-gas-king-a-guide</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theweek.com/article/index/229080/the-trials-and-tribulations-of-americas-natural-gas-king-a-guide</guid><description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://media.theweek.com/img/dir_0078/39476_article_main/chesapeake-energy-corp-ceo-aubrey-mcclendon-watches-the-oklahoma-city-thunder-play-the-billionaire.jpg?174&quot; /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;p1&quot;&gt;In 1989, Aubrey McClendon started Chesapeake Energy with 10 employees. Today, the company is the country&#039;s second-largest producer of natural gas after Exxon Mobil; it got to that place using a controversial drilling technique known as fracking to tap into previously inaccessible reservoirs of natural gas in shale rock. McClendon has been hailed as a visionary in the industry, and analysts say fracking could one day make America energy-independent for the first time in modern history. But lately, McClendon has been in the headlines for all the wrong reasons. Chesapeake shareholders say he is running...&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://theweek.com/article/index/229080/the-trials-and-tribulations-of-americas-natural-gas-king-a-guide&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator>The Week</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:29:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>The first BP oil spill arrest: An instant guide</title><link>http://theweek.com/article/index/227156/the-first-bp-oil-spill-arrest-an-instant-guide</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theweek.com/article/index/227156/the-first-bp-oil-spill-arrest-an-instant-guide</guid><description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://media.theweek.com/img/dir_0076/38213_article_main/former-bp-engineer-kurt-mix-leaves-the-federal-courthouse-in-houston-after-he-was-charged-with-two.jpg?174&quot; /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;Almost exactly two years after BP&#039;s Deepwater Horizon oil-drilling rig exploded, killing 11 people and eventually sending more than 200 million gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, the Justice Department made its first arrest relating to the disaster on Tuesday. Federal investigators charged former BP engineer Kurt Mix, 50, with two criminal counts of obstructing justice for deleting hundreds of potentially damning text messages. What&#039;s the story with this curiously belated arrest? Here, a concise guide:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How was Mix involved in the disaster?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;Until he resigned last June, Mix was a drilling...&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://theweek.com/article/index/227156/the-first-bp-oil-spill-arrest-an-instant-guide&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator>The Week</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:04:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>BP oil spill: The &#039;horribly mutated&#039; creatures living in the Gulf</title><link>http://theweek.com/article/index/227011/bp-oil-spill-the-horribly-mutated-creatures-living-in-the-gulf</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theweek.com/article/index/227011/bp-oil-spill-the-horribly-mutated-creatures-living-in-the-gulf</guid><description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://media.theweek.com/img/dir_0076/38088_article_main/nearly-two-years-after-the-bp-oil-spill-commercial-fisherman-are-finding-shrimp-in-the-gulf-that.jpg?174&quot; /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;Shrimp born without eyes, clawless crabs, and fish with visible tumors are among the &quot;horribly mutated&quot; marine animals found in the waters off the Gulf Coast, according to a new report from&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Al Jazeera&lt;/em&gt;. Scientists say the problem is a side effect of the April 2010 explosion of BP&#039;s Deepwater Horizon oil rig, which killed 11 people and spilled at least 4.9 million barrels of oil into the ocean. Here, a brief guide to the damage:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Is it just the oil that caused mutations?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No. Also to blame are the nearly 2 million gallons of chemical dispersants, such as&amp;nbsp;petroleum distillates and 2-butoxyethanol...&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://theweek.com/article/index/227011/bp-oil-spill-the-horribly-mutated-creatures-living-in-the-gulf&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator>The Week</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:01:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Can natural gas drive the U.S. economy?</title><link>http://theweek.com/article/index/226830/can-natural-gas-drive-the-us-economy</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theweek.com/article/index/226830/can-natural-gas-drive-the-us-economy</guid><description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://media.theweek.com/img/dir_0075/37982_article_main/men-work-on-a-natural-gas-valve-at-a-hydraulic-fracturing-site-in-south-montrose-penn.jpg?174&quot; /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;p1&quot;&gt;In a few short years, the U.S. has become a major player in the field of natural gas, the cleaner energy alternative to oil and coal. Thanks to hydraulic fracturing, or fracking &amp;mdash; a controversial drilling technique that extracts natural gas from shale rock &amp;mdash; the U.S. has a surplus of the resource. As a result, natural gas in the U.S. has gotten cheaper and cheaper, plunging to $2 per 1,000 cubic feet for the first time in a decade. When you consider that the same quantity costs more than $9 cost in Europe and nearly $16 in Asia, it&#039;s clear we have an eminently exportable commodity that...&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://theweek.com/article/index/226830/can-natural-gas-drive-the-us-economy&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator>The Week</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:42:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Why you&#039;re wrong about gas prices and politics</title><link>http://theweek.com/bullpen/column/226563/why-youre-wrong-about-gas-prices-and-politics</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theweek.com/bullpen/column/226563/why-youre-wrong-about-gas-prices-and-politics</guid><description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://media.theweek.com/img/dir_0069/34566_article_main/paul-brandus.jpg?174&quot; /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;I recently wrote about the many myths and misunderstandings Americans have about gas prices, oil companies, and the presidency. A few folks got upset because the facts and figures I mentioned weren&#039;t what they wanted to hear. But as John Adams said: &quot;Facts are stubborn things.&quot; With that in mind, here are a few more myths and misunderstandings &amp;mdash; about gasoline, renewable energy, politicians &amp;mdash; and the facts:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Myth #1: Presidents have major power over gas prices&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gasoline prices have more than doubled on Obama&#039;s watch, from $1.89 on Inauguration Day in 2009 to last week&#039;s $3.93 (AAA data...&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://theweek.com/bullpen/column/226563/why-youre-wrong-about-gas-prices-and-politics&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator>The Week</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:00:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Did Obama&#039;s EPA kill coal power?</title><link>http://theweek.com/article/index/226189/did-obamas-epa-kill-coal-power</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theweek.com/article/index/226189/did-obamas-epa-kill-coal-power</guid><description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://media.theweek.com/img/dir_0075/37561_article_main/a-coal-fired-power-plant-in-tampa-fla-new-epa-rules-could-make-it-nearly-impossible-to-build-new.jpg?174&quot; /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;p1&quot;&gt;Move over, &quot;Old King Coal.&quot; The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the first time has announced greenhouse-gas limits for new power plants, in a move that &quot;could end the construction of conventional coal-fired facilities in the United States,&quot; says Juliet Eilperin at &lt;em&gt;The Washington Post&lt;/em&gt;. The EPA didn&#039;t single out coal plants, but its limits are strict enough that it&#039;s unlikely any coal plant will be able to meet them. Natural gas plants, which use a cleaner source of energy, make the grade, while the Obama administration hopes that the new rules will encourage the manufacture of plants that...&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://theweek.com/article/index/226189/did-obamas-epa-kill-coal-power&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator>The Week</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 06:30:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Obama&#039;s Keystone Pipeline turnaround: A &#039;publicity stunt&#039;?</title><link>http://theweek.com/article/index/225997/obamas-keystone-pipeline-turnaround-a-publicity-stunt</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theweek.com/article/index/225997/obamas-keystone-pipeline-turnaround-a-publicity-stunt</guid><description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://media.theweek.com/img/dir_0074/37431_article_main/president-obama-speaks-at-keystone-xl-pipeline-site-in-the-south-thursday-trying-to-have-it-both.jpg?174&quot; /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;President Obama says&amp;nbsp;he will fast-track construction of the southern portion of the Keystone XL Pipeline, an ambitious energy project that is intended to transport oil from Canada in a snaking tube all the way down to the Gulf of Mexico. Obama put the pipeline on indefinite hold earlier this year, claiming that Republicans in Congress were recklessly pushing the project forward without heeding environmental concerns. His latest concession is a move to defend his energy policies, which are under the klieg lights now that gas prices are soaring. But Republicans slammed Obama&#039;s support for the...&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://theweek.com/article/index/225997/obamas-keystone-pipeline-turnaround-a-publicity-stunt&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator>The Week</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:08:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>The Keystone XL pipeline: Would a catastrophic oil spill be inevitable?</title><link>http://theweek.com/article/index/225772/the-keystone-xl-pipeline-would-a-catastrophic-oil-spill-be-inevitable</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theweek.com/article/index/225772/the-keystone-xl-pipeline-would-a-catastrophic-oil-spill-be-inevitable</guid><description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://media.theweek.com/img/dir_0074/37302_article_main/workers-clean-up-a-massive-oil-spill-in-michigan-in-july-2010-some-researchers-say-a-similar-spill.jpg?174&quot; /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;President Obama&#039;s controversial rejection of the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada to refineries on the Gulf Coast promises to be a contentious issue in this year&#039;s presidential election, as Republicans accuse Obama of killing a project that would have created 20,000 badly needed jobs. But a new study by Cornell University&#039;s Global Labor Institute is bolstering the position of the pipeline&#039;s environmentalist opponents, suggesting that the potential job gains might not be worth the considerable risk of a catastrophic spill. Here&#039;s what you should know:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What exactly does the study say...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://theweek.com/article/index/225772/the-keystone-xl-pipeline-would-a-catastrophic-oil-spill-be-inevitable&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator>The Week</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:15:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Obama&#039;s $50 light bulb: &#039;Too pricey&#039;?</title><link>http://theweek.com/article/index/225434/obamas-50-light-bulb-too-pricey</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theweek.com/article/index/225434/obamas-50-light-bulb-too-pricey</guid><description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://media.theweek.com/img/dir_0074/37044_article_main/philips-won-the-us-department-of-energys-l-prize-with-an-led-bulb-that-is-cost-efficient-in-the.jpg?174&quot; /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Obama administration announced last year that it would award $10 million to the company that could create a light bulb that was both eco-friendly and affordable. The winning LED bulb, made by Philips, is about to hit the market. There&#039;s only one problem: It costs $50. The price of your standard incandescent bulb, on the other hand, hovers in the $1 region. The $10 million award, dubbed the L Prize, is part of the government&#039;s plan to phase out all energy-wasting incandescent bulbs over the next several years. But could Obama&#039;s $50 light bulb possibly be worth its price?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;p1&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;No one will pay $50...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://theweek.com/article/index/225434/obamas-50-light-bulb-too-pricey&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator>The Week</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:10:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The return of deepwater drilling: By the numbers</title><link>http://theweek.com/article/index/225199/the-return-of-deepwater-drilling-by-the-numbers</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theweek.com/article/index/225199/the-return-of-deepwater-drilling-by-the-numbers</guid><description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://media.theweek.com/img/dir_0073/36907_article_main/oil-rigs-off-the-coast-of-long-beach-calif-the-obama-administration-has-approved-more-than-400.jpg?174&quot; /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;When BP&#039;s explosion-wrecked Deepwater Horizon oil rig was bleeding millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico from April to August of 2010, an overwhelming number of critics questioned the safety of deepwater oil drilling. Those days seem to be long gone. It&#039;s been more than a year since the Obama administration ended its post-spill moratorium on deepwater Gulf wells, and today, deepwater drilling is expanding in the waters off Mexico and Cuba, in the Mediterranean, and off the coast of East Africa. &quot;We need the oil,&quot; Rice University energy expert Amy Myers Jaffe tells &lt;em&gt;The New York Times...&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://theweek.com/article/index/225199/the-return-of-deepwater-drilling-by-the-numbers&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator>The Week</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:07:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>High gas prices: Blame the Fed?</title><link>http://theweek.com/article/index/225009/high-gas-prices-blame-the-fed</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theweek.com/article/index/225009/high-gas-prices-blame-the-fed</guid><description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://media.theweek.com/img/dir_0073/36785_article_main/federal-reserve-chairman-ben-bernanke-are-the-feds-easy-money-policies-pushing-up-fuel-prices.jpg?174&quot; /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;When the 2008 financial crisis struck, the Federal Reserve unleashed billions of dollars into the market in an attempt to jump-start the economy. Skeptics at the time said the Fed&#039;s loose monetary policies, which amounted to printing more money, would lead to a spike in inflation. Now that gas prices are rising, critics are bringing out their knives for the central bank, saying it is responsible for drivers&#039; pain at the gas station. And they say the Fed holds the key to lowering prices, too &amp;mdash; all it has to do is turn off the money spigot. Is the Fed to blame for expensive gas?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;p1&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Absolutely...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://theweek.com/article/index/225009/high-gas-prices-blame-the-fed&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator>The Week</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 08:10:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>5 myths about gas prices, Big Oil, and the presidency</title><link>http://theweek.com/bullpen/column/224968/5-myths-about-gas-prices-big-oil-and-the-presidency</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theweek.com/bullpen/column/224968/5-myths-about-gas-prices-big-oil-and-the-presidency</guid><description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://media.theweek.com/img/dir_0069/34566_article_main/paul-brandus.jpg?174&quot; /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;When it comes to presidential elections, gas prices aren&#039;t as important as you think. Sure, they&#039;re a relevant data point, but a study by Yale economist Ray Fair shows that dating back to 1948, there is&amp;nbsp;little correlation between election results and your pain in the gas.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Take 1992. Gas prices were at their lowest levels in decades. The economy was pulling out of a recession. And the president had just won a war in convincing fashion. What happened next? Voters gave President George H.W. Bush the boot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fast forward to 2004. The economy was again pulling out of a recession &amp;mdash; but gas...&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://theweek.com/bullpen/column/224968/5-myths-about-gas-prices-big-oil-and-the-presidency&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator>The Week</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:30:00 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>