Will the Steubenville rape verdict deter sexual assault?

On Sunday, two Steubenville, Ohio, teenagers — Trent Mays, 17, and Ma'lik Richmond, 16 — were found "delinquent" (guilty) in juvenile court of raping an unidentified 16-year-old at a series of parties last August. The trial had garnered widespread media attention because of the prominent role social media played in documenting the assault, the involvement of hactivist collective Anonymous in publicizing the case, and allegations that the defendants were initially given special treatment because they were part of the popular Steubenville High School football team.

Richmond and Mays will spend at least a year in juvenile detention — Mays will spend at least two because he was also convicted of taking a photo of the passed-out girl nude — and they both could be locked up until they are 21. Reactions to the verdict were strong, and mixed, locally and nationally. CNN came in for its own share of criticism, largely because correspondent Poppy Harlow's initial reaction was about how it was "incredibly difficult, even for an outsider like me, to watch what happened as these two young men that had such promising futures, star football players, very good students, literally watched as they believed their lives fell apart." (Watch the video below; read a scathing takedown from Gawker's Mallory Ortberg here.)

And while the trial of Richmond and Mays is over, Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine announced after the verdict that he is empaneling a grand jury in April to examine if anyone else should face charges in the small eastern Ohio town. State investigators interviewed 56 people — including the Steubenville High principal and its 27 football coaches, plus the district superintendent — and 16 of them refused to cooperate. The grand jury is necessary because Steubenville "desperately needs to be able to put this matter behind it and begin to move forward," DeWine said, pivoting to the bigger picture:

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Rape may be way too common, but rape convictions are not, says Kathleen Geier at Washington Monthly. Quite the opposite. "Using statistics from the Justice Department and the FBI, RAINN (Rape, Abuse, and Incest National Network) reports that out of every 100 rapes that occur, 46 get reported to police, 12 lead to an arrest, 9 get prosecuted, 5 lead to a felony conviction, and 3 see the inside of a prison cell." The other "97 lucky rapists"? They walk. So while "at some level, it's sad to see two such young men" get sent into our awful prisons, these "prison sentences serve an extremely important purpose."

We don't need any of these "What It Means sermonettes" from the liberal media, says Robert Stacy McCain at The Other McCain. This was one crime, committed by two teenagers, that the media and Anonymous transformed into "a bogus narrative that impugned the entire town of Steubenville and even the tradition of high school football." The concerted effort to "turn this one incident into a symbol — something about 'rape culture' or whatever — is typical of how the media get it wrong with their 'make a difference' social-justice crusader mentality."

This rape case was different, and there are broader implications for society, says Adam Cohen at TIME. And what made the case a potential game-changer is the outside role text-messaging and social media played. "It is a whole new kind of crime when teen sexual assault meets social media and goes blaringly, glaringly public."