The Week The Week
flag of US
US
flag of UK
UK
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Less than $3 per week

Sign in
  • View Profile
  • Sign out
  • The Explainer
  • Talking Points
  • The Week Recommends
  • Newsletters
  • Cartoons
  • From the Magazine
  • The Week Junior
  • More
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Business
    • Health
    • Science
    • Food & Drink
    • Travel
    • Culture
    • History
    • Personal Finance
    • Puzzles
    • Photos
    • The Blend
    • All Categories
  • Newsletter sign up Newsletter
  • Saturday Wrap, from The Week
    Starmer and Macron's new plan, food aid in Gaza, and 'excuses, excuses'

     
    controversy of the week

    One-in, one-out

    There "was a sense of déjà vu" last week, said Gavin Mortimer in The Spectator, as Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron proudly unveiled the latest plan to "stop the boats". Will this one work any better than its predecessors? Under a new "one-in, one-out" scheme, migrants arriving in the UK on small boats will be returned to France; for each migrant sent back, the UK would accept an asylum seeker who hasn't tried to enter illegally.

    Starmer called the initiative "groundbreaking", said Andrew Neil in the Daily Mail, but in truth, it is – as the French would say – "ne vaut pas un clou" (not worth a nail). First, the deal needs to be signed off by EU member states; at least five, including Italy, have already objected. Deportations will "trigger endless challenges in the courts". Then there's the issue of scale. Only 50 migrants a week will be removed at first. To put that in context, on the day that Starmer and Macron were unveiling this "latest wheeze", 573 migrants arrived on our shores. Some 38,000 crossed the Channel in the year to March. At that rate, just one in 14 can expect to be returned – "not much of a deterrent for migrants prepared to risk their lives and life savings to make the journey".

    The deal isn't perfect, agreed John Rentoul in The Independent. But for the first time, Macron has been persuaded to break ranks with other EU members (and countless politicians in his own country) and take a number of small boat migrants back. For that breakthrough alone, "Starmer should be being carried shoulder-high through the streets of Dover with Nigel Farage leading the parade". As for numbers, 50 migrants a week is just a start. If the scheme works, it can be scaled up; when enough migrants realise they're making a wasted journey, Channel crossings will dwindle to a trickle, "and the UK would quickly be freed from the requirement to take any refugees at all".

    That's the theory, at least. In reality, though, awkward questions remain, said Diane Taylor in The Guardian. Such as: who will be selected for removal? And be accepted in return? What happens to small boat arrivals who aren't deported, but whose asylum claims are rejected? Until those are answered, this scheme is riddled with as many potential holes "as a flimsy dinghy trying to cross the Channel".

    And it still won't address the central problem, said Henry Hill on UnHerd: namely, as Macron rightly pointed out, that Britain's own policies make this country a "very attractive destination" for irregular migrants. Unlike many EU countries, "we have neither a contribution-based welfare system nor a national identity card". That means people can come here confident that they'll be housed and fed, or if they don't receive asylum, escape into the black economy with slim risk of deportation. We can strike as many return deals as we like, whether it's one-in, one-out, or Rwanda. But until we fix those "pull factors", we won't "shift the odds enough to stop people getting in the boats".

     
     
    BRIEFINg

    The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation

    Much of the food aid given out in the Gaza Strip is now being distributed by a secretive and widely condemned new organisation

    How has the aid system changed?
    On 30 January, Israel banned the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (Unrwa), the main Palestinian relief agency, from operating in the country. On 2 March, it also blocked the entry of all humanitarian aid – food, fuel and medicine – into Gaza, accusing Hamas of diverting or stealing aid; Israel insisted it would only resume deliveries if Hamas' leaders agreed to new ceasefire terms. Aid groups such as the World Food Programme (WFP) used up their stockpiles, and had distributed the last of them by April (though since then limited supplies have resumed). The UN warned that Gaza's entire population was at risk of famine. In May, Israel announced a solution: a new Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) would distribute aid.

    How does the GHF distribute aid?
    Unrwa had been operating in Gaza for decades, and agencies such as the WFP for many years. They had built up a network of more than 400 distribution centres, which handed out food regularly and systematically to its population of 2.1 million. Families received text messages telling them when to collect aid; the incapacitated received deliveries. By contrast, the GHF runs just four "fortified hubs" near areas controlled by Israel Defense Forces, three in the south and one in northern Gaza, where Palestinians must go to pick up food. People travel long distances to get there, and gain access to the hubs through narrow corridors. The crowds are large and desperate for food. The approaches are guarded by IDF soldiers, with guns, tanks and drones, and the hubs themselves by mostly US security contractors. Once inside, aid distribution is often uncontrolled, with crowds fighting for food. There are few checks on who is receiving the aid; NGOs have warned that the IDF could screen recipients using biometric processes linked to Israeli databases. The process has been chaotic, and very costly in terms of human life.

    How many people have been killed?
    In the first five weeks of operation, 615 Palestinians were killed at or near GHF hubs, according to the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. Since then, fatalities near the aid centres average between 50 and 150 a day, according to Gaza's Hamas-run health ministry, with 4,500 wounded in total. Victims report being shot at by both IDF soldiers and contractors as they queue for food. Tensions are heightened by the centres' opening hours, which are brief and unpredictable. If crowds gather too early or grow too large, distributions are often cancelled, and soldiers and security contractors fire at civilians to keep them away from sites, even when visibility is poor. According to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, IDF commanders have "ordered troops to shoot at crowds to drive them away or disperse them, even though it was clear they posed no threat". Israeli officials rejected the allegations but said they were investigating.

    Why did Israel bypass aid groups?
    The Israeli government has long clashed with NGOs in Palestine, especially Unrwa, which it accuses of being ideologically opposed to Israel, and of being infiltrated by Hamas: it claims Unrwa staff were involved in the 7 October 2023 attacks. A UN probe found that nine staff (out of 13,000 in Gaza) could have been involved. Israel also says that Hamas seizes aid and exploits it to shore up its power. It's hard to be sure, since foreign reporters are banned from Gaza, but the UN disputes this account; it estimates that by late 2024, more than a third of aid entering Gaza was being looted, but largely by armed gangs in "organised crime on a massive scale" – mostly in Israeli-controlled areas, and sometimes by armed factions with Israeli backing.

    Who owns and runs the GHF?
    It's not clear. Its first director, Jake Wood, abruptly resigned the day before distribution began, saying that the GHF would not adhere "to the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence". His successor, Johnnie Moore Jr, is a US evangelical pastor with close links to Trump's White House, but little aid experience. The GHF is a US entity registered in Delaware. Security is handled by a company based in Wyoming, run by former CIA officers and soldiers. Until last week, its spokesperson in Israel was Shahar Segal, a wealthy restaurateur. The foundation has no website. Funding sources are unclear, though the US State Department recently gave it $30 million, bypassing standard checks. Israel is presumed to provide most of its backing, which is estimated at $150 million per month. Both the Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid and the former minister Avigdor Lieberman have hinted that the money comes from Israel via shell companies.

    Who has condemned the GHF?
    More than 240 NGOs have called on Israel to shut down the GHF because of the mass casualties, and argued that, as the UN Human Rights Office stated, it is complicit in the "weaponisation" of aid. The fear is that it is being used not just to put pressure on Hamas, but to push Palestinians further south in Gaza, possibly as the prelude to removing them – a policy that the Israeli and US governments both support. The UK and the EU have condemned the GHF, and called for more aid to be sent into Gaza via the UN. In recent days, Israel appears to have agreed to this.

    What does the GHF say?
    The GHF says it is tackling hunger in Gaza by distributing boxes containing flour, rice, pasta, tuna, oil and hygiene supplies. It says it has given out 70 million meals, a record the US State Department calls "absolutely incredible". The GHF insists nobody has been killed at (as opposed to near) its hubs, and blames negative publicity on Hamas "misinformation". Moore accuses UN agencies of maintaining a "mafia" monopoly that has enabled Hamas to control nearly every food parcel entering Gaza.

    The plan for a 'humanitarian city'
    Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz last week laid out a plan to transfer much of Gaza's population into what he called a "humanitarian city", on the ruins of the city of Rafah in southern Gaza. Palestinians would go through "security screening" before entering, and then would not be allowed to leave, Katz said at a briefing for Israeli journalists. Initially, the plan was to move 600,000 displaced people from the Al-Mawasi area. Eventually, the entire population of Gaza would follow, and Israel would encourage Palestinians to emigrate, Katz reportedly said. The proposal was widely described as a contravention of international law, and a blueprint for crimes against humanity – and the IDF has refused to carry it out. Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir, the chief of the general staff, said that the military's duties did not involve forcibly moving civilians. He argued that the plan was not part of the stated objectives of the war: to destroy Hamas and free the remaining hostages.

    In February, President Trump declared that Gaza should be turned into a US-owned "riviera". Its inhabitants would be relocated, "by choice". Israel's PM Benjamin Netanyahu enthusiastically supports the plan; polls suggest two-thirds of Israelis do too.

     
     

    Spirit of the age

    A rock band that topped Spotify's daily chart in the UK, Sweden and Norway has been uncovered as an AI hoax. The Velvet Sundown, who have 1.4 million monthly listeners, quickly reached No.1 on the streaming site after releasing their debut album "Floating on Echoes", which listeners have likened to the folk-country of Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young. Promo photos showed the band's four "members" sporting denim jackets and long hair. But after weeks of speculation about the band's origins, a statement was issued confirming that The Velvet Sundown was an AI creation, as part of an "ongoing artistic provocation". One fan vowed to continue playing their music during his yoga sessions, praising their songs' "emotional tone".

     
     
    Viewpoint

    The British dream

    "A post on X/Twitter recently asked people what the British dream is, and received the usual ironic answers: 'new trousers and a functional belt'; 'no neighbours'; 'chicken tikka masala'. But I think the real answer is revealed by 'The Salt Path' controversy. Surely the British dream is to watch middle-class people who have made a lot of money from looking earnest being exposed as (alleged) spongers and fantasists. And if some famous actors are taken in as well, even better. It's a telling irony that a film about the scandal, ideally still starring Gillian Anderson and Jason Isaacs, would do significantly better in British cinemas than the drippy film that actually got commissioned.

    Sathnam Sanghera in The Times

     
     
    talking point

    Gregg Wallace: excuses, excuses

    "There have been many bizarre excuses for poor behaviour over the years," said Kristina Murkett on UnHerd. Consider Dominic Cummings' "trip to Barnard Castle for an eye test", or the Lib Dem MP Mark Oaten's claim that he used male prostitutes because he was so upset that he was balding. We can now add to this list Gregg Wallace, who was sacked from "MasterChef" by the BBC after 45 allegations against him were upheld – one of unwanted touching, three that he was in a state of undress, seven of bullying, along with a plethora of complaints that he had made sexualised and inappropriate remarks. Wallace has claimed that all of these resulted from a misunderstanding of his autism, and of his working-class ways. "I was hired by the BBC and 'MasterChef' as the cheeky greengrocer," he wrote on Instagram. "That authenticity was part of the brand. Now, in a sanitised world, that same personality is seen as a problem." He added that his neurodiversity – only diagnosed after the scandal erupted – had been long suspected by producers. "Yet nothing was done to investigate my disability or protect me from what I now realise was a dangerous environment for over 20 years."

    So the BBC should have protected him from this "dangerous environment", said Hadley Freeman in The Sunday Times. By which Wallace meant not, say, Gaza, but "studios full of women who did not enjoy his 'authenticity'". And, by authenticity, it seems, he meant "opening the door of his dressing room wearing only a sock on his penis and shouting 'Hooray!'. You know, like authentic people do." In addition, said Marina Hyde in The Guardian, "friends" of Wallace told The Times that his autism "means he can't wear underwear": he is "hypersensitive" to tight clothes and labels. So the argument, if I've got this right, is that the man is "medically incapable" of staying in his trousers.

    It's pretty disgraceful to use autism as an excuse, said Jessie Hewitson in The i Paper. Yes, autistic employees need to be supported. But the condition "isn't a free pass to behave in a way that negatively affects other people". Wallace may have one point, though, said Alison Phillips in the same paper. The BBC, and Banijay UK, which makes "MasterChef", should have done something about this years ago. At least a dozen official (and many more unofficial) complaints were made over the years. Why wasn't he dropped or suspended or kept in line? We've seen this again and again at the BBC and in the wider TV industry: a failure to stand up to "creeps" who can "read an autocue".

     
     

    It wasn't all bad

    A three-year-old girl from Powys will compete at next year's Crufts with her miniature schnauzer, Zeeva, after becoming one of the youngest-ever handlers to qualify for the show. Caitlyn Mellor, whose first word was "doggy", has been competing at shows since the age of two, and made the cut for Crufts via a ranking performance at the Three Counties Championships. She says she loves "winning" and "getting rosettes". Her mother, Lydia, added that she was "so proud" of her daughter, whom she described as "an incredibly good sport" – never forgetting to shake hands with judges and other competitors at dog shows.

     
     
    people

    The actor whose career took off at 68

    Anne Reid graduated from Rada in 1955 and worked steadily over the next decades, but it was only in 2003, when she was cast in "The Mother", that her career really took off, says Simon Hattenstone in The Guardian. In the film, she played a widow who has an affair with a man half her age (Daniel Craig). Before that, films about relationships between women and much younger men had tended either to be comedies ("Harold and Maude") or to star famous beauties – such as Anne Bancroft in "The Graduate" (and she was only six years older than Dustin Hoffman). So this film was groundbreaking. The director, Roger Michell, explained to her that they had not wanted to cast Julie Christie "because everyone wants to f**k Julie Christie" – the implication being, Reid notes, "that no one in their right mind wants to f**k me. He [also] said he was looking for someone 'you wouldn't notice if you passed them in Tesco'. Thanks a lot!"

    Now 90, Reid is still working hard, and as a late bloomer, she can't stand it when older people give up. "A dear friend said it to me yesterday: 'Oh, I'm 62 now – I might never do another play.' Then a taxi driver – I live in black cabs – said, 'It's all over now.' He was in his early 60s, and you think My God! Well, if you don't need those years, give them to me because I could do with them. So many of the most wonderful things in my life have happened since I was 68!"

     
     

    Image credits, from top: Dan Kitwood / Getty Images; Abaca Press / Alamy Live News; Andrew Matthews / Pool / Getty Images; John Phillips / Getty Images
     

    Recent editions

    • Morning Report

      Trump denies penning 'bawdy' Epstein letter

    • Evening Review

      Antisemitic artificial intelligence

    • Morning Report

      Trump trashes MAGA

    VIEW ALL
    TheWeek
    • About Us
    • Contact Future's experts
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Advertise With Us

    The Week is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

    © Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036.