Issue of the week: Skepticism over Snapchat
How could a money-losing app be worth tens of billions of dollars? asked James Stewart in The New York Times. Stock in Snapchat’s parent company, Snap Inc., closed 44 percent up on its first day of trading on Wall Street last week and rose another 20 percent the next day. Snap was briefly worth more than $40 billion—more than CBS, Delta, or Allstate. Those are eye-popping numbers for an app that lets you “send nude photos of yourself that self-destruct” and offers camera filters that “turn your head into a taco.” But it’s even more remarkable considering the company has lost money every year since it was founded in 2011, including $514.6 million in 2016, and has explicitly warned investors “it may never earn a profit.” Snap shares have fallen back to earth a bit since last week, said Nina Agrawal in the Los Angeles Times. But despite investors’ growing doubts, the company’s stock is still trading “well above what several Wall Street analysts believe Snap shares are worth.”
“There’s actually good reason to be bullish about Snap’s future,” said Timothy Lee in Vox.com. Pessimists point out that Snapchat has about 158 million daily active users compared with 1.23 billion for Facebook. The app’s growth has also slowed recently, leading to fears it might become the next Twitter, a major Wall Street disappointment. But Snapchat has a secret weapon: young people. The app is more popular among Americans ages 18 to 29 than either Twitter or Facebookowned Instagram. Advertisers are “particularly eager” to reach these consumers, who are developing brand loyalties that will last the rest of their lives. Snap’s “cool” factor could just as easily backfire, said Davey Alba in Wired.com. Investors will expect to see massive growth. But cool “means your parents never get on Snap. And that means Snap never gets to add them to the number of users on its platform.” To succeed, Snap will have to prove that its smaller, more connected audience is more valuable to advertisers than simply a large one.
Despite those troubles, Silicon Valley is thrilled to see one of its vaunted “unicorns” go public, said Om Malik in NewYorker.com. Unicorns are tech startups valued at $1 billion or more. But where the unicorn label once signified rareness, “now it is a kind of yardstick for measuring ego.” Today, there are nearly 200 startups valued at $1 billion or more, but they are likelier to go belly-up than to become the next Facebook. The flash-sales startup Gilt Groupe, for example, was valued at a billion dollars in 2011 but was acquired earlier this year for only a quarter of that. Investors hope that Snap’s initial public offering will trigger a fresh wave of technology IPOs after a relatively light 2016, possibly including Uber, Airbnb, and Dropbox. “But the real renaissance won’t come about until investors can learn to evaluate companies on the basis of their business prospects rather than their cachet.” ■