The Week The Week
flag of US
US
flag of UK
UK
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/skoGBi9qKFoUtnNWkovjJQ.jpg

SUBSCRIBE

Try 6 Free Issues

Sign in
  • View Profile
  • Sign out
  • The Explainer
  • Talking Points
  • The Week Recommends
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletters
  • From the Magazine
  • The Week Junior
  • More
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Business
    • Health
    • Science
    • Food & Drink
    • Travel
    • Culture
    • History
    • Personal Finance
    • Puzzles
    • Photos
    • The Blend
    • All Categories
  • Newsletter sign up Newsletter
  • Saturday Wrap, from The Week
    Teenage controversy, the death of a dictator, and the US-Saudi relationship

     
    briefing of the week

    The death of Franco

    General Francisco Franco, western Europe’s last dictator, died 50 years ago, leading to the restoration of the Bourbon monarchy

    How did Franco die?
    General Franco, who had ruled Spain since his military defeat of the Second Spanish Republic in 1939, made his last public appearance on 1 October 1975. Looking gaunt and ill, he warned of a “Masonic, Leftist and Communist conspiracy against Spain”. In early November, he was taken to La Paz Hospital in Madrid, where he died shortly after midnight on 20 November. Later that day a mournful PM, Carlos Arias Navarro, made a televised speech to the nation, which began: “Españoles, Franco ha muerto.” (“Spaniards, Franco has died.”) A national mourning period of 30 days was declared, and tens of thousands of people lined up to view Franco’s body lying in state in the Royal Palace. After his funeral, he was taken to be buried at the Valley of the Fallen, a colossal memorial near Madrid built in part by political prisoners; the cortège was greeted by 75,000 blue-shirted supporters of the fascist Falange, Spain’s sole legal political party.

    Who took power after him?

    Franco claimed to rule as “head of state of the Kingdom of Spain”. But actually, he disdained the exiled heir apparent of the royal House of Bourbon, Don Juan, Count of Barcelona, whom he regarded as a dangerous liberal. Instead, Franco exercised near-absolute personal power as “Caudillo”, or military dictator. He merged his far-right Falange political party with the Carlists, right-wing monarchists, to form a National Movement, Spain’s only political institution. During his 36-year rule, he exercised dominance via the military and the Catholic Church; and closely controlled the media. In 1969, though, Franco confirmed that the monarchy would be restored upon his death, and named Juan’s son, Juan Carlos, as his heir apparent. For six years, he groomed Infante Juan Carlos as his successor; and in November 1975, two days after Franco’s death, King Juan Carlos I ascended the throne.

    How did the transition to democracy come about?
    Juan Carlos swore to uphold the laws of the Francoist state; and repression continued in the early days of his rule. But he also promised a “monarchy of all Spaniards”, where Franco’s rhetoric had insistently divided the nation between the civil war’s “victors” and “vanquished”. Spain had changed greatly during Franco’s rule: the poverty-stricken economic autarky of the decades after the civil war ended with liberalisation in 1959, and the ensuing “Spanish economic miracle”; an educated middle class and a richer industrial worker class had emerged; and the growth of mass tourism had opened Spain up to the world. In the first months of Juan Carlos’ rule there was a clamour for change, with widespread strikes and protests.

    How did Juan Carlos react? 
    In 1976, he appointed Adolfo Suárez to replace the hardline Arias Navarro as PM. Suárez, who had Francoist ties but reformist aims, is often seen as the hero of la Transición: he swiftly dismantled vast tracts of the Francoist state and liberalised the political system. The Political Reform Law of 1976 legalised other political parties and established an elected parliament. Censorship was later eased and religious freedom was granted for the first time. In June 1977, Spain held its first elections in 41 years; 18 months later, a new constitution retaining the monarchy was approved in a referendum, bringing the Franco era to a formal end. So as to ensure a peaceable transition, though, Suárez forged what is called “the Pact of Forgetting”. The Amnesty Law of 1977 granted amnesty for regime-era crimes, which meant there was no justice over Francoist abuses.

    Was the transition smooth?
    No. By the early 1980s, the upbeat mood that had followed liberalisation had given way to Basque separatist violence, soaring unemployment and discontent with Suárez’s civilian government. On 23 February 1981, some 200 civil guards stormed the Cortes, the Spanish parliament. They fired machine guns, and ordered legislators on to the floor. Parliamentarians, staff and journalists dived for cover. Fear spread across Spain. In response, King Juan Carlos ignored trusted advisers who supported the coup attempt and presented it as a fait accompli, and made addresses on the radio and on television in which he condemned it, and vowed to punish those responsible. By the following morning, order had been restored. The final vestiges of fascism in Spain had been defeated, and Juan Carlos had secured his own reputation as a defender of democracy.

    Did Juan Carlos remain well-liked?

    For years, he was one of the world’s most popular monarchs. Under his constitutional monarchy, Spain joined Nato in 1982 and the EEC in 1986, and is now among the world’s most liberal nations. Yet public opinion shifted during the course of Juan Carlos’ rule as a new generation demanded higher ethical standards from their king, who had a reputation for scandal and philandering. His libido was once described as a “state problem” by the Spanish Secret Service; according to one biographer, he has slept with 5,000 women. In 2012, while Spain was suffering an economic crisis, he had an accident while hunting elephants in Botswana with his ex-mistress, Corinna zu Sayn-Wittgenstein. There was an outcry, and €65 million worth of gifts he had reportedly given her became a key focus of investigations into his finances: he was accused of taking bribes for facilitating a Spanish high-speed rail contract in Saudi Arabia.

    What’s the situation today?
    Following that scandal, in 2014 Juan Carlos abdicated in favour of his son, Felipe, after 39 years on the throne. Felipe has sought to slim down and modernise the monarchy; Juan Carlos now lives in exile, on a private island in Abu Dhabi. He remains an ambiguous figure, praised for his role in la Transición, but tainted. Like many in Spain, he feels some residual affection for Franco, whom he described in a recent memoir as like “a father” to him.

    Generalissimo: a career in violence
    Francisco Franco Bahamonde was born to a military family in Ferrol, Galicia in 1892. He entered the army at a young age, and gained rapid promotion as a colonial officer in Morocco, fighting the vicious Rif War to put down a tribal rebellion. In 1936, he joined the army coup against the Second Spanish Republic, and from July brought the Army of Africa over from Morocco to Seville in the first major military airlift, using planes lent by Mussolini’s Italy and Hitler’s Germany. In October, he was declared Generalissimo and Jefe del Estado of the Nationalist side. His forces, the most effective in Spain, backed by Germany and Italy, fought their way across Spain, “cleansing” Republicans kilometre by kilometre, using tactics developed in Morocco: torture, rape, summary executions. The White Terror, as it is known, continued after the Nationalist victory (Madrid fell in March 1939). Perhaps 150,000 Republicans, suspected dissidents and other “enemies” were executed, and around 750,000 were interned in concentration camps; Franco killed more of his own people than Mussolini. That he still has admirers in Spain is explained in part by the Red Terror, in which tens of thousands were executed by extreme elements on the Republican side.

     
     

    Spirit of the age

    More than half of published novelists in the UK believe that AI could replace their work entirely, according to a new report from Cambridge University. The study surveyed 258 novelists: 51% thought AI was likely to replace them; 39% said their income had already fallen as a result of it. Romance authors, followed by thriller and crime writers, were deemed the most exposed.

     
     
    controversy of the week

    The US-Saudi relationship: too big to fail?

    “Donald Trump may have cleared the high bar of uttering the most appalling remark of his presidency,” said Fred Kaplan on Slate. “Things happen,” he declared last week in response to a question about the murder of the US-based journalist Jamal Khashoggi in 2018. This while sitting in the Oval Office next to the man whom the CIA believes ordered that killing, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. MbS, as he’s called, at least sought to “convey the impression that he knew the murder was contemptible”, describing it in the press conference as a “huge mistake”. Not so Trump. He disparaged the dead Washington Post journalist – “a lot of people didn’t like that gentleman” – and exonerated MbS: “He knew nothing about it, and we can leave it at that.”

    Trump’s “lies” about Khashoggi overshadowed a visit that benefited Saudi Arabia more than the US, said The Washington Post. Trump agreed to sell it F-35 fighter jets and advanced AI chips, and give it “major non-Nato ally” status. In exchange, the Saudis committed to invest nearly $1 trillion in the US, although “they offered no time horizon for this far-fetched figure, which is roughly the size of their annual economic output”. Still, it makes “cold-hearted” sense for the US to cultivate MbS, said David Ignatius in the same paper. He could rule for many decades, and his “continued success in modernising the kingdom is crucial for the future security of the Middle East”. Having neutered the religious police and “empowered” women, he’s working to export that liberalising agenda to other places, such as the West Bank and Syria.

    Trump isn’t the first president to conclude that the US-Saudi relationship is “too important to let human rights get in the way”, said Joshua Keating on Vox. In 2020, Joe Biden promised to make Saudi Arabia a global “pariah”. Yet the spike in oil prices following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine led to Biden’s “infamous fist bump” with MbS in Riyadh in 2022. Saudi Arabia, for its part, still regards America as its key defence partner, although it is forging increasingly close economic links with China and recently signed a defence pact with Pakistan.

    For now, the two nations feel that they need each other. In the future, though, the big question may not be whether “the US can stomach a relationship with Saudi Arabia – but whether Saudi Arabia still needs a relationship with a country as unpredictable as the US”.

     
     
    talking point

    Nigel Farage: was he a teenage racist?

    It is the hectoring, jeering tone in Nigel Farage’s voice that brings it all back for Peter Ettedgui, said The Guardian. Farage used the same tone, at Dulwich College, the south London private school that both men attended in the late 1970s, when he would sidle up to him and growl: “Hitler was right” or “Gas them”. He would sometimes add “a long hiss to simulate the sound of the gas showers”, says Ettedgui, now in his 60s, who was one of the few Jewish children at the school. It wasn’t just Jews the young Farage singled out. “I’d hear him calling other students ‘P*ki’ or ‘W*g’ and urging them to ‘go home’,” says Ettedgui. Farage has denied the specifics of these allegations. But The Guardian has spoken to 22 contemporaries and former teachers who say otherwise. They remember him, as a prefect, singling an Asian boy out for detention, for no reason; doing Nazi salutes and chanting “Oswald Ernald Mosley”; and singing racist songs as an army cadet. No one is claiming that Farage still holds such views. “Nevertheless, extreme views in any person’s history matter, particularly if that person may be a future PM.”

    “A smear campaign is always a nasty thing,” said Brendan O’Neill in The Telegraph. “Deploying rumour and insinuation to taint the reputation of someone you hate – it’s the lowest form of politics.” Obviously, Farage denies these claims, but “there is just something so ominous, so elementally unpleasant about marshalling childhood rumours against a 61-year-old man”. The most recent offence The Guardian accuses him of took place more than 40 years ago. In the case of some allegations, he was just 13 or 14 at the time. “Jim Callaghan was prime minister. The Sex Pistols were storming the charts.” Bear in mind, too, that social norms were different back then, said Niall Gooch in The Spectator. “There were not the same sensitivities around racially charged language. It is absurd for this to be an issue in national politics in 2025.”

    I agree up to a point, said Victoria Richards in The Independent. We were all idiots at school, and I wouldn’t want to be judged for many things I did as a 16-year-old. But we weren’t all vile racists. Farage’s sort-of denials have been “slippery”. He claims that he “never directly racially abused anyone”, and didn’t engage in “racism with intent”; that it was only “banter”. Even so, surely it’s “revealing” that he apparently chose to make jokes about the Holocaust, and to sing horrific songs about gassing Jews and P*kis. The child is father to the man. Isn’t it fair to suspect that Farage’s teenage prejudices might have an influence on his “grown-up” policies?

     
     
    Viewpoint

    Advent calendars

    “It is believed that in the fourth century, early Christians first observed ‘the Advent’, a sombre time for contemplation. In 2025, it seems, mostly, to represent an opportunity to pluck miniature diversions out of perforated-cardboard compartments. People with a tenuous relationship to Jesus Christ spending their Decembers counting down the days until his birthday, by opening doors behind which they are finding just about anything – tea, designer lipstick, wine, weed, cheese, knives, crystals, smoked sausage, toys for children, toys for dogs, toys for cats, toys for sex. They are participating in an ancient, sacred ritual by unboxing their daily thong.”

    Ellen Cushing in The Atlantic

     
     

    It wasn’t all bad

    A three-year-old boy’s response to pioneering gene therapy has delighted doctors at Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital. Oliver Chu, from California, suffers from Hunter syndrome, a rare disorder that stops his body from producing a crucial enzyme. The disease gradually robs children of their physical and cognitive abilities; but within months of being given enzyme infusions, Oliver was talking more and moving freely. Now his body has started making its own supply of the enzyme, and he is happily running about and talking. “He’s like a completely different child,” said his father.

     
     
    People

    Michelle Obama

    During her eight years in the White House, Michelle Obama had a “glam squad” to help her with her wardrobe, hair and make-up, says Pandora Sykes in The Sunday Times; but even with these experts on hand, figuring out what to wear could be fraught with difficulty. She had to look the part, of course – but anything too flashy was out, because it would risk distracting from whatever cause or event she was promoting. “I would tease Meredith [Koop, her stylist] if she brought something with a huge bow … Or if it was too much like, Hey, I’m a belt, see me roar!” She was too active to just put on “a skirt and kitten heels”. As she notes: “My day could include being in the dirt, tilling the soil with fifth-graders. [Then] I’d have to change quickly to maybe do a speech in front of military mothers, and then run and play with puppies because we’re doing a special Let’s Move! thing for the Super Bowl…”

    And though she and her husband were not “designer clothes people”, she felt a responsibility to champion young designers, because the exposure could change their lives. All of this while being acutely conscious that, as the first Black Flotus, she’d always be held to different standards. “I got dinged for showing my arms,” she says – though many previous First Ladies had done so. “We were accused of being terrorists when I gave my husband a playful fist bump.” As she writes in a new book, “I couldn’t afford any missteps.”

     
     

    Image credits, from top: Matthew Chattle / Future Publishing via Getty Images; Keystone / Getty Images; Win McNamee / Getty Images; Arturo Holmes / Getty Images
     

    Recent editions

    • Evening Review

      What does the net migration drop mean?

    • Morning Report

      Government U-turn on ‘day one’ dismissal rights

    • Evening Review

      Distant drums

    VIEW ALL
    TheWeek
    • About Us
    • Contact Future's experts
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Advertise With Us
    • FAQ
    Add as a preferred source on Google

    The Week UK is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

    © Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.