Mothers are increasingly turning to the internet to buy breast milk for their newborns.
The problem? Researchers from Nationwide Children's Hospital found that nearly 75 percent of the breast milk they purchased online was contaminated by potentially harmful bacteria, including salmonella. Twenty percent of the samples contained cytomegalovirus, or CMV, which can cause serious illness in premature babies.
Sites like OnlyTheBreast.com function kind of like a Craigslist for mothers, connecting women who want to donate or sell their breast milk with mothers who want to buy it. As Katie Drummond pointed out at The Verge, the posts on these sites often "read like a series of personal ads for human mammary fluids," boasting qualities like "my milk is gluten-free, dairy-free, and nut-free" to potential buyers.
The main culprits for the potentially unsafe milk, according to the study published in the November issue of Pediatrics, are poor handling by the donors or sellers, unclean containers, and long shipping times, which can allow for bacteria to grow if sellers don't pack their milk with dry ice or use other cooling methods.
Seeing as the prospect of buying human milk online seems inherently sketchy, if not dangerous, why are mothers doing it?
The "breast is best" motto doesn't come from nowhere. The World Health Organization recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of a baby's life, and the benefit newborns get from the nutrients and antibodies in breast milk is well-documented.
But not every mother can breastfeed her child, including women on certain prescription drugs, adoptive mothers, and those who are physically unable to breastfeed because of, say, a mastectomy.
That leaves them in a tough spot. Besides milk-sharing sites, there aren't a lot of places for moms to find breast milk.
One alternative are milk banks, which are a safer bet thanks to strict screening standards and mandatory pasteurization. Unfortunately, they aren't even close to meeting the national demand, supplying just 2.15 million ounces of the needed 9 million ounces of breast milk in 2011, according to The New York Times.
Much of that milk is reserved for premature babies in hospitals, with the remaining supply is only available to healthy babies with a prescription.
Rachel Emma Silverman, writing for the Wall Street Journal in 2011, explained why more women probably don't donate:
I won't sugarcoat it: The screening process to donate to a milk bank might be prohibitive for many mothers, because of the time and restrictions involved… I had to fill out a lengthy health and lifestyle questionnaire, have two phone interviews with milk bank staffers, and a blood draw to make sure that I was an appropriate donor. Drinking, smoking, or even regularly taking medications or herbal supplements, including common SSRI antidepressants, are considered no-nos for donors (with some exceptions)… What's more, at this milk bank you needed to be able to give at least 100 ounces of milk, which means that moms can't just drop off a few extra 6-ounce baggies found deep in the freezer. [Wall Street Journal]
Those high standards explain why milk banks charge as much as $6 an ounce — meaning your average 1-month-old would cost you $150 per day to feed. Compare that to the $1.47 an ounce researchers paid on milk-sharing sites.
In the meantime, the FDA hasn't explicitly banned breast milk sold online, only recommending against "feeding your baby breast milk acquired directly from individuals or through the internet."
So what is the solution? In the long term, the study recommends that more women donate to milk banks, instead of selling or donating their milk online. For mothers who want to buy breast milk right now, however, there just aren't that many good options.
"I hate to say this to an informal sharer, because they are trying to do good," Kim Updegrove, president of the Human Milk Banking Association, told the Times. "But they are playing a game of Russian roulette."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Hey, bosses: Stop giving bonuses to your employees
- How academia's liberal bias is killing social science
- You should be furious about Hollywood's gutless retreat on The Interview
- Why the Sony hack changes everything
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- Why torture doesn't work: A definitive guide
- Capitalism isn't a cure-all for Cuba
- One girl's extraordinarily wild world
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Vox, derp, and the intellectual stagnation of the left
Subscribe to the Week