Happy birthday, Social Security. Now, time for reform?
The pioneering social program turns 75 this week. Is it a good time to think about restructuring it?
It was three score and 15 years ago that Franklin D. Roosevelt signed Social Security into law. Since then, the public program has changed the lives of elderly Americans, now providing 40 percent of the average retiree's income. But it also accounts for a whopping 4.8 percent of GDP — a figure that will rise as the population ages. Many Republicans want to rein in Social Security, with a few — including Rand Paul — calling for the program to be privatized. For Democrats, on the other hand, Social Security is a cornerstone of their social policies, and President Obama used its birthday to restate his support for it. Does America's largest social welfare program need to be revamped for the 21st century? (Watch Obama's Social Security birthday wishes)
Social Security reform is desperately needed: Our payroll tax just doesn't pay for Social Security any more, says Stephen Spruiell at the National Review. This year, it sucked up $41 billion of extra revenues and will consume "even larger chunks" of America's wealth in years to come. Unless something changes, Social Security will either mean "higher taxes, fewer benefits or some combination of both." Democrats can't keep insisting nothing's wrong.
"Flimflam from the master himself"
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Talk of reform is about politics, not money: Republican "hostility" to Social Security isn't about "dollars and cents," says Paul Krugman at The New York Times. "It's about ideology and posturing." In fact, Social Security won't need federal bailouts or benefit cuts until 2037 at the earliest. Conservatives hate that fact, because "it undermines their claim that government is always the problem, never the solution." But this program has "brought dignity and decency" to the nation's elderly. Cuts shouldn't be on the table.
The Democrats are just as keen on cuts as the GOP: Actually, the biggest threat to Social Security is the Democrats themselves, says Glenn Greenwald at Salon. Obama's Deficit Commission is currently "cooking up" ways to reform the program, which will likely include "serious cuts in benefits." Even as this is going on, Obama is cynically "scaring Americans into believing that a GOP victory would endanger their benefits." The program is under siege from all sides.
"The fear campaign and Social Security"
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Will Trump’s 10% credit card rate limit actually help consumers?Today's Big Question Banks say they would pull back on credit
-
3 smart financial habits to incorporate in 2026the explainer Make your money work for you, instead of the other way around
-
‘The surest way to shorten our lives even more is to scare us about sleep’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day