The Library of Congress and the U.S. Copyright Office ruled Monday that iPhone and other smartphone users can legally "jailbreak" their handsets, which is to say: Hack the operating system in order to use non-approved applications such as MxTube (which lets you store YouTube videos to watch when you're offline) or Cyntact (which lets you add photos to your iPhone contact list). Though the ruling was a win for the Electronic Frontier Foundation over longtime opponent Apple, what have iPhone users really gained? (See a "jailbroken" iPhone)

This ruling doesn't change much: You'd think Apple would learn a valuable lesson about the beauty and appeal of an open software system, says Barbara Krasnoff in Computerworld, but it probably won't. And aside from the handful of avid jailbreakers — who weren't deterred by the law-breaking, anyways — it "will probably not make a huge difference to most iPhone users," either.
"An iPhone jailbreak! Call the cops! No..."

Apple can still punish jailbreakers: Bringing the jailbreaking community out of the underground should boost the quality of unauthorized apps, says Alexis Madrigal in The Atlantic. But note what the ruling doesn't do — namely, protect the producers of such apps legally, or keep Apple from "playing hardball" with users by, for instance, refusing to repair a jailbroken phone that has been "locked down" (or "bricked").
"Jailbreaking your iPhone now legal"

Apple should shrug and move on: I don't get why Apple even bothered fighting "the niche population of phone tinkerers," says Dan Frommer in the San Francisco Chronicle. The "vast majority of iPhone users" just "want their phone to work," and will avoid the risks of jailbreaking it. And even if people do want to tinker, why should Apple care? They make all their money from selling the phones; the apps are "a break-even business."
"Apple still has nothing to worry about..."