Should fake tanners be taxed?

What's behind the Senate's decision to replace the "Bo-tax" on cosmetic surgery with a levy on indoor tanning

In the rush to finalize the health-care reform bill, the Senate voted Sunday to forgo a 5 percent tax on cosmetic surgeries and introduce a 10% levy on indoor tanning sessions instead — leaving some observers baffled. While the proposed "Bo-tax" on plastic surgery was projected to yield $5.8 billion over ten years, the new scheme will raise less than half that amount. (Watch a report about the Bo-tax.) Why did the Senate switch tactics and decide to penalize fake-sun worshippers?

Lobbyists proved the 'Bo-tax' was discriminatory: Plastic surgery advocates and feminist groups united to argue that the fee would penalize middle-class, middle-aged women struggling to remain viable in the job market' says Janice Turner at the Times Online. And they have a point: "If women want to be heard, to continue to participate in society… they must remain youthful."

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up
To continue reading this article...
Continue reading this article and get limited website access each month.
Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters plus much more.
Cancel or pause at any time.
Already a subscriber to The Week?
Not sure which email you used for your subscription? Contact us